Talk:Over the Limit (2010)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleOver the Limit (2010) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 1, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that four separate wrestlers suffered legitimate injuries at WWE's Over the Limit pay-per-view?
WikiProject iconMichigan: Detroit Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed.

WP:WIAGA
for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: (Quality is very good.)
    B.
    lists
    : (Everything is perfect in this section.)
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A.
    References to sources
    : (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)
    C. No original research: (No original research found.)
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
    B. Focused: (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
  4. Is it
    neutral
    ?
    Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
    fair use rationales
    : (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
    suitable captions
    : (Captions and pictures are good)
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. Much appreciated. NiciVampireHeart 17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]