Talk:Pat the Bunny

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former good articlePat the Bunny was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 13, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
July 24, 2006Good article nomineeListed
April 26, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
May 19, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

Failed Good Article

  • Auto-fail: Do not nominate articles that are still considered stubs and that have incomplete sections. --
    SeizureDog 04:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]

GA

Short but sweet, good article indeed. Can I just say one thing? Awwww. ;) Highway Return to Oz... 16:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add section?

Recently there has been a popular parody of this in America, 'Pat the Politician'. Should we add a section detailing how Pat the Bunny was parodied to make Pat the Politician? Thanks. Ilikefood 22:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely - I've missed that parody. Put it under a ==Parody== header, I'd say. - DavidWBrooks 14:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Patthebunny.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 19:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Good Article Reassessment

I'm de-listing this article, as I don't think it passes criterion 3 (breadth) of the

Good Article criteria. I realize it may be difficult to write a substantial article about a book of this kind, but there must be more to say about something that has sold so consistently for so long. If nothing else, I find myself unable even to visualize the book itself. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 19:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 08:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pat the Bunny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]