Talk:Person to Bunny

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Animation: American / Looney Tunes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Low-importance).

According to the 1989 reference book Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies: A Complete Illustrated Guide to the Warner Bros. Cartoons by Jerry Beck and Will Friedwald, this short was released on April 1, 1960. TweetiePie1947 keeps insisting that this short was "cancelled," but has provided no evidence of this, and has repeatedly removed my sourced addition.

Since we've both violated 3RR by this point, does anyone else care enough to take a look at this article? Trivialist (talk) 02:59, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what this argument is about but I will help if I can. Is it just about whether 'Person to Bunny' was 'cancelled'?Martin Hogbin (talk) 08:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much. TweetiePie1947 seems to be certain that the short must have been cancelled, but hasn't provided anything to back this up. Trivialist (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the unsourced changes made by TweetiePie1947. Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see what is going on here now. TweetiePie1947 is edit warring to remove sourced content without any discussion. They do not seem to have responded to comments made on their talk page or here. I think some form of administrative action is called for. Martin Hogbin (talk) 11:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest raising the issue on