Phi Mu Delta is part of the Fraternities and Sororities WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Greek Life on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to International social societies, local organizations, honor societies, and their members. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project page, where you can join the project, and/or contribute to the discussion.Fraternities and SororitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesTemplate:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesFraternities and Sororities articles
Wikify : Confirm that the lion and scales are the relevant, public symbolism you want for the infobox. Is the Lion Line still published? Confirm it; I added it to the list of Phi Mu Delta's print publication in the infobox. Confirm the physical address and website. Occasionally, confirm the number of chapters and add the number of lifetime members. Expand the History section to include more milestones. The discussions with Delta Phi and Alpha Delta Gamma for a possible merger would be interesting. You can add a list of the founders, also bulleting them. On its linked page, the chapter list should be placed into a table format, like this: Omega Tau Sigma or Sigma Delta Rho (to reference two unrelated examples). A chapter list should include dates of chartering and dates of inactivity. Indicate if a chapter is active by bolding its name, or if inactive by using italics. A table will allow room where chapter references may point to portal pages, and allow comments on where a chapter came from, interesting facts or its outcome. A table may also be used to showcase notable members, but be sure to add Inclusion Rules to avoid vanity listings
.
Probable copyvio
It appears that much of the content of this article is a
WP:COPYVIO. Most of it matches, word for word, content from this page [1] It's possible that this is a false match, and that the website copied Wikipedia, but I kinda doubt it. The Wikipedia article has a few typographic idiosyncrasies that suggest it was copied from somewhere else (odd carriage returns, and the use of 'curly' quotation marks). Regardless, it's way, way too promotional, and it's removal is no great loss. This level of minutia is better served on the fraternities own website where is can be properly curated anyway. Grayfell (talk) 06:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Wrong link, I meant this one, which is also used as a source. The above link is also a copy of material on this page, but it's more plausibly derived from Wikipedia. Grayfell (talk) 06:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
