Talk:Philo Vance

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Crime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Crime task force. project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Collaboration of the Week : Requests for Radio peer review: Rod Serling The Howard Stern Show The History of Rock & Roll American Top 40; The Museum of Curiosity; Scott Mills (radio show)

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

I added the list of films and verified them with IMDB, then checked them against my own collection; to my surprise, I was missing one. I have a note from TCM's website (http://forums.turnerclassicmovies.com/jive/tcm/thread.jspa?threadID=96272&tstart=0) that suggests that Night of Mystery is only available through either the U.S. Library of Congress or UCLA. The same note cites The Scarab Murder Case (1936) starring Wilfrid Hyde-White as Philo Vance as being lost. Does anyone have any information about these two films? Accounting4Taste 22:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been cleaning up the descriptions of the novels, giving citations where possible. If anyone could take on describing the novels that remain (because I don't have copies of the novels) that would be great. Accounting4Taste 04:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To the original article, I have added content, slightly revised/deleted some of the original text, and added links where called for--all to make a more complete article. I have shown respect for the original author's pride of authorship.

I plan in the future to supplement text in the articles on the individual novels, as requested by Accounting4Taste. I have copies of all the novels.

Marshall H. Pinnix 01:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The content you've added largely comes under the heading of "original research". Please read through the article at

to find out why your original research is not what should go into Wikipedia articles. (I have little hope that you are going to understand this or agree with it, judging by the contents of your talk page, but I thought I'd start there.) In the process of adding your original research, you have also spoiled the formatting, broken all the links between the footnotes and their associated reference works, and added multiple paragraphs of nonsense to the end of the article. I'm not sure where to start with this, but please, don't "improve" any other articles without consultation. By the way, everyone has copies of all the novels; links to the public-domain content of each novel are at the end of the article about each individual novel. Accounting4Taste 01:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've started the long and discouraging process of cleaning this up... I've removed the nonsense characters, and I'm going to work backwards with an old version of this article and try to restore the footnotes and references. Anyone who'd like to help out would be more than welcome. Accounting4Taste 04:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure someone who owns a copy of Catalogue of Crime will be able to return the recently-deleted footnote/citation, and to IMDB at the same time. Accounting4Taste 15:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The disparagement of Philo Vance and

]

Philo Vance Parodies?

Is their enough material to justify adding a section to the main article?

1. "Sherlock Holmes: The Archive Collection: The Strange Case of Hennessy." An escaped lunatic poses as famed detective Silo Dance in this musical comedy mystery set in an old dark house in this spoof of S.S. Van Dyne's famed sleuth Philo Vance. Season 1 Episode 5 | Aired on 01/01/1933. Source: 16 minute video on hulu.com

2 Soupy Sales had a recurring sketch about Philo Kvetch, a parody of Philo Vance.

AdderUser (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would make a fine addition to the article with proper sources. However, despite the serious tone of the article, the Philo Vance novels stand on their own as parodies of the detective genre. The "solution" to the crime, given by Vance after his usual erudite and obfuscatory speech running for a couple of pages, is based on the flimsiest evidence only tangentially related to the actual events. The books were meant to be absurd entertainment, and the "decline" in the last half-dozen or so can be attributed partly to a contractual obligation and partly to the disappointment of the author when people actually took them seriously. IMHO. Wastrel Way (talk) 19:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Eric[reply]