Talk:Philosophical Magazine

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Academic Journals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Physics: Publications Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Publications Taskforce. Resource Exchange If you have access to this resource, or if you need to verify a citation from this reference, check out WikiProject Resource Exchange.Resource ExchangeWikipedia:WikiProject Resource ExchangeTemplate:WikiProject Resource ExchangeResource Exchange articles

I started an article on Richard Taylor (editor). According to the information available, he was born in 1781. That would make him around 17 years old when he started the Philosophical Magazine. -- Petri Krohn 02:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

de:Göttingische_Gelehrte_Anzeigen (unfortunately not yet translated) is in its 259th year, thus abt. 50 years older than Phil. Mag. --Dschwen(A) 10:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a particular reason such a historically significant journal would have such a low impact factor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brydustin (talk • contribs) 23:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]