Talk:Physical Review Applied

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2013. The result of the discussion was Redirect.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Academic Journals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a new journal with the name Physical Review Applied. No need to re-direct. Please discuss here, if you disagree.

• You are violating the consensus from this. You have presented no evidence of there being independent notability. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Could you add the following categories to the article

• Category:American Physical Society academic journals
• Category:Physics journals

Thanks. It also might be time to reconsider the full protection on this page. The AfD-related dispute is long resolved. Blocking the user would have been much better than FPing the page in the first place.

Those are content categories, so I don't think there are appropriate for adding to a redirect. Nonetheless I have lifted the protection. Presumably Mark Arsten is okay with this. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect must be removed because Physical Review Applied is a journal all by itself such as