Talk:Pope John numbering
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Requested move 1 March 2017
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. (talk, contribs) 23:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)]
Pope John (numbering) → Pope John numbering – Improper use of disambiguating parenthesis since the numbering dispute would not itself be known simply as "Pope John." Unless anyone can think of a better title for this, removing the brackets is appropriate. Ribbet32 (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
]
- Support move. This one's as noncontroversial as any Pope-related move can be. (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Support per WP:DAB; the nominator's analysis is correct. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 22:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Support per original proposal. I wonder if there's a title that would sound a little less stilted ("Numbering of Popes John?") but the proposed one is probably fine. --Jfruh (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Or Pope John numeration? One of my hopes in starting this RM was that we could come up with a less pedestrian title. Ribbet32 (talk) 19:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.