Talk:Preparedness Movement
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposal to merge with Preparedness controversy
This article and
Preparedness controversy are essentially the same topic. Both are stubs, and would do well to merge. The only question might be this: which article to merge with which - what should the title be? Bsimmons666 (talk) Friend? 20:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
]
Done Merged to Eldereft (cont.) 16:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)]
"Portions of this article were ported from Citizendium"
The citation:
- Portions of this article were ported from Citizendium
- reference:
- World War I, American entry - encyclopedia article - Citizendium
seems to be an unreliable source, and the wiki code was suspicious, thus removed
69.181.23.220 (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Citizendium was pretty good source (it's now largely inactive) and I was one of the authors. see Citizendium and Wikipedia:We aren't Citizendium. The porting here of text was part of a long-term Wikipedia project. see Wikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium Porting Wiki's Copyright rules require the notice that portions were copied. Rjensen (talk) 06:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)