Talk:Pretty Fly (For a White Guy)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Video

Why is there no mention of the video? Especially the 'wigger'/geek who stars in it. I can remember the band talking about this at the time, surely worth a mention?

81.131.48.137 (talk) 21:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

This page was moved from "Pretty Fly (For A White Guy)" to "Pretty Fly (for a White Guy)" as per the naming convention set out at

Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Album titles and band names – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:13, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply
]

what's Pretty Fly for a White Guy mean?

The obvious ? lol He's good looking, but only for a white guy. (also making fun of the "wigger", as mentioned in the text, people) —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by Ap2000 (talkcontribs) 00:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC).[reply
]

Evidence Needed

"They are frequently and incorrectly attributed to "Weird Al" Yankovic on file sharing networks." We need evidence of this. I will keep it up here for now though. Skullbird11 (talk) 17:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can definitely confirm that, but I am sadly not important. 24.95.247.110 (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PrettyFlyCover.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest Hits

I'm pretty sure (for a white guy?) that it was the seventh track at the GH album, because of the bonus-Track Can't Repeat wich was number1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.33.227.113 (talk) 20:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Gunter glieben glauchen globen"

thats not a German phrase, non of these words is German at all. he says "montag: lieben, lachen, loben" which means "monday: love, laugh, praise"--Dha (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At least Gunter is a common forename. -- Pemu (talk) 13:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is an evidence for this transcription? -- Pemu (talk) 13:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Punk rock?

seriously? anyone who calls this 'punk rock' needs a kick in the head. this is made-for-radio late-90s pop. 98.197.160.186 (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Since our own style guidelines contradict each other, we should defer to the band's preferred capitalization. Aervanath (talk) 22:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Pretty Fly (For a White Guy)Pretty Fly (for a White Guy) – Per capitalisation rules. --The Evil IP address (talk) 10:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Correct title

The Offspring's site is not parameter, because they have Pretty Fly (For A White Guy) as title, two prepositions with capital letter, "For" and "A". The discussion is only about the "For". The correct title for the article is

WP:TITLE and WP:CAPS. OffsBlink (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The correct page should be Pretty Fly (For a White Guy) as the word "for" is capitalised because it's at the start of an open bracket.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 17:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Requested move 26 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Pretty Fly (for a White Guy) → Pretty Fly (For a White Guy) – The word "for" is capitalised in this consensus, it's at the start of an open bracket Hadji87 (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Why? If a word is at the beginning of an open bracket, it's classed as a new sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.239.180 (talk) 19:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is it? I don't think so. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pretty Fly (For a White Guy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]