Talk:Priestess (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Itching to edit these again

So I really want to bring every Priestess-related article up to as high a standard as possible. My sandboxes at the moment are devoted to subject matters relating to the band, and I just brought-in a metric crap ton of stuff I was working on. Obviously it's far from complete, so any help would be greatly appreciated. To be clear, I am not

Guy 06:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

We need a citation for this

[Mikey Heppner] later commented that the term sounds like something that would already have been used as a band name, but that an Internet search only turned up top results such as

Guy 08:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I just know I've seen that somewhere...
Guy 04:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

My inspiration

Since it's a featured article, I'm using

Guy 03:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The Fanzine

Based on its name, I have my concerns over whether this constitutes a

Guy 03:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Hiatus

Mikey Heppner said through Facebook that the band have taken an indefinite hiatus. If/when this turns-up in

Guy 04:56, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Source publishers

I just realized I may want to include the names of each source's publisher. Maybe I'll get to that soon...

Guy 09:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Pictures

Man, this article could sure benefit a hell of a lot from pictures... Unfortunately I have none that would be suitable. Never been to a concert, never seen one of these guys in public.

Guy 06:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Source for their hiatus

I have a feeling that if/when Priestess returns is when we'll finally get a reliable source saying they were ever on hiatus in the first place. I won't hold my breath, but I'll just wait and see what happens.

Guy 17:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

RCA vs. Tee Pee

Much was made of the fact that RCA and Tee Pee are two different types of labels, first a major label than an indie one. That might have some place in the article.

Guy 16:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Singles

The band's two other singles are "Run Home" and "Lay Down" (the latter is even explicitly referenced in the article as such). However, I am unable to substantiate the order in which they were released; for that reason I have omitted them. I'm not sure which would be worse, Wikipedia lacking information or Wikipedia having incorrect information, but for now I'll choose the former. It's a way of saying, "At least what we DO have is correct."

Guy 18:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Vince Nudo and the Violators

I took this out because even if it were true it would require that he joined the band because of Priestess' current inactivity. And also, the way it was written, it would look better on Vince Nudo's article... which he does not have at the moment because he does not yet warrant one.

Guy 03:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Assessment

It needs a call out for the most popular songs, with reviews. And especially the inclusion to Guitar Hero. Flesh the discography. Find cites to talk about their influences. Since only Heppner (not any of the band members) has his own article, there needs to be a bit more detail in this article about what each member does (including Heppner)instruments played, influences, style, training. The overall tone of the narrative is a little too casual, including internal motivations and anecdotes. Sharpen that to more encyclopedic approach. Fill in some tour information. You could easily have a B article, or a Good Article. EBY (talk) 04:18, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, some feedback! Reviews are a tricky thing to integrate into an article and I've only recently started doing so. The discography is a bit problematic considering some songs are cited as singles in some sources (of varying reliability) and not in others, and some are cited as "lead singles" (i.e. the first single to come from an LP) in some of those places and not in others. Actual release dates are never quite clear. Up until now I was worried more about integrating facts, that is, things that have been said about the band's history as having been true and painfully aware of the absence of any kind of critical reaction (which I've partially remedied in my last edit to the article as of this writing, which was of course after this talk post was made). It's too bad that a lot of really good info appears in sources that aren't
Guy 13:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Priestess (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priestess_(band)&oldid=1206916844"