Talk:Qing dynasty coinage/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Gold 🥇 Qing coins.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Gold_coins_issued_under_the_Guangxu_Emperor.jpg/220px-Gold_coins_issued_under_the_Guangxu_Emperor.jpg)
The above image is from
Sent from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱.
--1.55.177.78 (talk) 12:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Qing Dynasty coins being dug up. ⚱💴
It's not uncommon for news 📰 reports to report on Qing Dynasty coins being dug up, such as 500 kg. of it in the attached source (The Telegraph). The Ancient Chinese coinage articles lists a few of these events, I'm not sure if content such of that would improve the article or not, especially since the Qing dynasty only ended around a century ago. 🤔 --1.55.183.244 (talk) 06:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Images in the Wikitable.
The reason I included the images in the Wikitable is so
- Seems fine to me. Sunshine Alexi (talk) 13:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Why the Guāng Xù Yuán Bǎo (光緒元寶) coin is omitted from the list of Qing Dynasty "Cash coins". 📝
One of my main “reference lists” is the reference a reference list for 5.000 years of Chinese coinage (though in reality this has only been around 2, and a ½ thousand years), and they name a coin on their list called the Guāng Xù Yuán Bǎo (光緒元寶), now does this coin exist? Well, yes, and no. My original intent of writing both this article, and the
Sent from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --58.187.171.100 (talk) 11:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: The same type of coin is also a 大清錢, these inscriptions should be counted separate in a different series. --Donald Trung (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Possible split
It might be wise to create a separate article on the History of foreign coinage in China covering the silver coinage from other countries that circulated in China under Manchu rule. --Donald Trung (talk) 11:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Quality of article
It would be worth considering nominating the article for A or GA status.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- @the readers don't notice the difference anyhow as they're just looking for information. --Donald Trung (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Removed image
@Baomi:, just curious, but why did you remove this image? --Donald Trung (talk) 08:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- It's too high and very fuzzy, I think the second picture of Abkai fulingga han jiha is enough for the section.--Baomi (talk) 08:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Understandable, the characters on the image aren't readily readable without much effort, however it would be wise to write such things in an edit summary the next time so it doesn't just appear as if you randomly remove an image without a reason. Simply saying 'one image is sufficient" or something would've cleared up what you were thinking as others can't read your mind. --Donald Trung (talk) 08:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/68/Later_Jin_dynasty_coinage_%281616%E2%80%931636%29_screenshot_to_use_at_a_talk_page_%2818_D._12_M._2018_A.%29.png/220px-Later_Jin_dynasty_coinage_%281616%E2%80%931636%29_screenshot_to_use_at_a_talk_page_%2818_D._12_M._2018_A.%29.png)
- I do have to admit that the images from the illustration look vague but ome thing the illustration did provide was an example of Manchu script, of course the characters weren't that readable but I would propose if a better quality image depicting all Later Jin Dynasty cash coins together that we should replace the image of only one coin with that of more coins, but you were right that this image is a bit too blurry. --Donald Trung (talk) 09:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- I do have to admit that the images from the illustration look vague but ome thing the illustration did provide was an example of
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)