Talk:Quainton Road railway station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

Trains Portal DYK December 3, 2007 Sel week 51, 2010 London Transport Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

Would a regular editor here care to review the material that I have added to

Where are they? Jackiespeel (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@

five standard appendices, all of which are optional (but you'll have a hard time getting an article to FA-class w/o some refs). --Redrose64 (talk) 10:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Just reads odd to have just the info box. Perhaps [1] and [2] on the Disused Stations website? (My interest is only tangential.) Jackiespeel (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By "the info box", I take it you mean the box headed "Preceding station Historical railways Following station" - that's not an infobox (there's an infobox top right of the lead section) but a succession box, and so is not one of the appendices but one of the

WP:FOOTERS, as are the two navboxes below it. That box beginning "Wikimedia Commons has ..." is a link to sister project, not part of the footers but normally placed at the top of the last section. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

My recollection is that if sister links are the only links to external websites (treating other Wikimedia sites as external for these purposes) then we can use {{

Bencherlite^Talk 16:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

'Generalist WPists' are likely to call any boxed information including 'predecessor/successor' and 'next stations' infoboxes - and I did provide a link (but am not sufficiently into WP-trains-project to know what is being looked for) Jackiespeel (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quainton Road railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100730025121/http://www.theverneyarms.co.uk/ to http://www.theverneyarms.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]