Talk:Qubit fluorometer

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

as a scientist who actually uses the qubit, I dispute the advert flag; it is actually a pretty good article The qubit has gained wide acceptance in the DNA community; many people (personal communications) have abandonded other methods (eg, nano drop UV) for the qubit and i am not a life fanboy; they just got this product right

Reply: While there's nothing in the article that seems plainly untrue, I still has significant problems with the tone of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.91.19.123 (talk) 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Advert tags looks valid to me, in fact the sourcing is weak at a glance - none of them about the topic, presumably only mentions. Notability tag added. Widefox; talk 15:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability II and subsections

As a scientist who actually uses the Qubit fluorometer, I agree on the advert flag despite (or even more) the relevance of this device in the scientific community. As a first starting point for further revisions, I cut the article into preliminary subsections, removed the numerous redundant statements about the device, linked it within wikipedia and hope to gain an objective article soon. Bathyscapher (talk) 18:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Qubit fluorometer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110713071611/http://wetlab.izzid.com/2008/Feb/Review_of_Qubit/ to http://wetlab.izzid.com/2008/Feb/Review_of_Qubit/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]