Talk:Queen of the Lakes

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Lakes Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

As separate pages are created for the various applications of the title, a disambiguation page can (should) be made.RDavS (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am having difficulty nailing down information about the Frontenac, reported by most sources to be the first sailing vessel on the lakes in 1678. Other sources say Le Griffon was the first named ship and suggest that the Frontenac was nothing more than a crude and unnamed barge with improvised rigging and sails. For now I'm leaving things as is, since it seems to follow what most secondary source documents say; but will need to do further research and invite others to see if they can find better information in quotable sources, perhaps in primary source documents.RDavS (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am increasingly suspicious of the Frontenac. To date, examination of translations of journals by LaSalle and his associates find only Le Griffon as a named vessel. The same is true of secondary source documents that chronicle his explorations examined to date. There is reference to a "great bark" that was lost near the mouth of the Niagara while bringing supplies to build the Griffon, but other comments indicate that the lost vessel was but one of a number of smaller unnamed vessels. LaSalle's focus after returning from France in mid-1678 was not to build a fleet for Lake Ontario (called Lac de Frontenac at the time) but to promote his exploration and control over the upper lakes. For this purpose the Griffon was to be a key tool. One of LaSalle's contemporaries referred to a vessel used to supply the Griffon and the fort at Niagara as a "brigantine"; but it is apparent that they did not use this term with the precision and understanding we have today. The Griffon, too, was called by some a bark and by others a brigantine. For the present, again, I will leave things as found in a number of books and articles about Great Lakes ships, but I wonder what their source material was.RDavS (talk) 15:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made a change to reflect conflicting reports. See my talk page for further details on why.RDavS (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Queen of the Lakes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110526005113/http://www.boatnerd.com/swayze/shipwreck/q.htm to http://www.boatnerd.com/swayze/shipwreck/q.htm
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110708215922/http://www.d9publicaffairs.com/go/doc/443/115604/ to http://www.d9publicaffairs.com/go/doc/443/115604/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000210020912/http://www.co.hidalgo.tx.us/ to http://texashistory.unt.edu/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110203032559/http://www.abouthegreatlakes.com:80/sail.htm to http://www.abouthegreatlakes.com/sail.htm
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110129011920/http://www.abouthegreatlakes.com:80/ships1.htm to http://www.abouthegreatlakes.com/ships1.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bgsu.edu/colleges/library/cac/page39984.htmlat

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nebraska length shown is length between uprights, not overall length, which according to (Namesakes 1900-1909, page 30), is 280' which makes her longer than the David Dows although she was surpassed in 1879 by the New York (Namesakes 1910-1919 page 362), which also preceded the David Dows.

Nebraska, 1867 280' OA 267.33 (Between uprights) https://greatlakes.bgsu.edu/item/438276 New York 1879 281' OA 268.75 (Between Uprights) https://greatlakes.bgsu.edu/item/438327 David Dows 1881 278' OA 265.33 (Between Uprights) https://greatlakes.bgsu.edu/item/434870

Thanks, Jeff Squirrelscontrolmylife (talk) 04:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone had a column on the far left of the list to number the ships? It would be handy to see how many there have been over time... John R. Beck (talk) 19:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]