Talk:Quintipartite Deed

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. New Jersey Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Coxe–Barclay Line page were merged into Quintipartite Deed on 29 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the Thornton Line page were merged into Quintipartite Deed on 29 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the Lawrence Line page were merged into Quintipartite Deed on 29 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the Keith line page were merged into Quintipartite Deed on 29 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

There are many article related to the Colonial history of New Jersey, but unfortunately none give a comprehensive view of the complexities of the 17th and early 18th century. Indeed, at times they give conflicting information. This is another splinter in the already fragmented coverage of the subject. Djflem (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quintipartite Deed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071012050807/http://www.njpinelandsanddownjersey.com/open/index.php?module=documents&JAS_DocumentManager_op=viewDocument&JAS_Document_id=156 to http://www.njpinelandsanddownjersey.com/open/index.php?module=documents&JAS_DocumentManager_op=viewDocument&JAS_Document_id=156

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]