Talk:Reverberation (album)
Reverberation (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Echo404.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Good Article Review - Passing
Gave it a thorough copyedit but passing nonetheless. If you plan on making additions I recommend a 'Music' section that describes the themes and sounds of the record. Good work otherwise! NSR77 T 01:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Reverberation (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
Start class:
C class:
B class:
Great job, just one minor technicality when it comes to giving this a b-rating. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Last edited at 16:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 04:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)