Talk:Reverberation (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleReverberation (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 24, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Fair use rationale for Image:Echo404.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 07:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Good Article Review - Passing

Gave it a thorough copyedit but passing nonetheless. If you plan on making additions I recommend a 'Music' section that describes the themes and sounds of the record. Good work otherwise! NSR77 T 01:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Reverberation (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years
, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the album
  • Green tickY A track listing
  • Green tickY Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  • Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  • Green tickY At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Green tickY A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B class:

  • Green tickY All the C class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Green tickY No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  • Green tickY No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS

Great job, just one minor technicality when it comes to giving this a b-rating. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, yes that one minor line was enough! Great job! Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 04:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)