Talk:Rosedale Park, Detroit

A fact from Rosedale Park, Detroit appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,915 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that
Detroit's Rosedale Park, containing 1,533 properties, is the largest district in Michigan to be listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/December.

Wikipedia

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Description

Does Description really need two sections? Murderbike (talk) 17:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Andrew Jameson (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move, per discussion at Talk:Greektown, Detroit. -- tariqabjotu 06:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 14:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Support, use of the word Michigan is unnecessary disambiguation. Zarcadia (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose See my comments at
Talk:Brush Park Historic District. (The issue is the dropping of "Historic District", not the dropping of "Michigan" - which is unnecessary disambiguation as Zarcadia points out). I am opposing because this is one of many current, separate proposals to drop the words "Historic District" from Detroit article titles. Currently all such districts in Detroit use the phrase, as shown at Category:Historic districts in Detroit, Michigan. I think instead of half-a-dozen unconnected individual discussions about whether to delete the phrase, there should be a discussion at some central location about whether or not to include the phrase "Historic District" from Detroit articles, and an overall consensus reached. I am neutral on what that consensus would be. --MelanieN (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: Please see consolidated discussion at
talk) 03:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.