Talk:Royal Bermuda Regiment

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

British Overseas Territories Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. British Empire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force

I'm sure I recollect that the Queen's Jubilee Medal was authorised for all uniformed service personnel in Bermuda, including members of the Bermuda Regiment, the Bermuda Police Service, the Bermuda Reserve Police, the Bermuda Fire Service, and the Saint George's Fire Brigade. If so, I'm inclined to think this ia a dubious statement: The Warrant allowed the Regiment closer ties with the British Army, enabling it to participate in United Nations missions and making members eligible for decorations such as the Queen's Jubilee Medal. Does anyone know any better? Certainly, Bermudian servicemen had received Jubilee and Coronation medals before, but I'm uncertain if that was only members of detachments sent to official ceremonies in England, or to all members in service at those times. Aodhdubh 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first statement is correct on the issue of the QJM. Members of the Bermuda Regiment were eligible for the Silver Jubilee Medal, when no such Corps Warrant was in existance, so that statement is falacious. Morgans rum 16:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank the person who constantly updates the information on the Bermuda Regiment. I would like to point out that most of the photos on this web site are at least 10 years old. If they would contact Regimental Headquarters, I'm sure that the Public Relations Officer, would be more than happy to assist with updating the site.

On another issue, the affiliation with the Lincoln and Welland Regiment has never been formally ratified, in Canada and as such, in its present state is non existant. There are moves to re-invigorate this process. Morgans rum 16:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem like it's been ten years since I was discharged, but it will be in two months. Not much has changed, in terms of dress and equipment, except the introduction of PLCE to replace the '58 webbing. Anyway, there wasn't much on this page when I first got here so I added what I had :)

80.189.76.35 22:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And, sometimes I forget to logue in before posting... ;)

Aodhdubh 22:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and removed the falacious statement :)

Aodhdubh 06:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im concerned about the age of some of these pictures, I notice many show soldiers in what appears to be 84' pattern DPM. This would have been phased out in the regular army and mainland UK TA by around 1996, so its odd to see it still in use. Does bermuda recieve old stocks of 84' pattern kit or are these old pictures? WikipedianProlific^(Talk) 19:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • The Bermuda Regiment has always been slow to adopt new kit. Denison smocks were replaced by '68 Patt. DPM Jackets only about 1980. The '58 Patt. webbing has only recently been replaced by DPM PLCE. Green lightweight trousers and shirts were fully replaced by tropical DPM shirts and trousers by the mid-nineties. The DMS high boots (with toe-caps....derived from the previous ankle boots) were being replaced in the late '90s by British standard jungle boots, although those who had the new canvas-topped boots complained bitterly about them, especially, as they were not ideal for the cold and wet of Bermuda winters). As far as I know, the the standard issue uniform is still the DPM tropical shirt and trousers (now obsolete in the UK, having been replaced by Soldier 95), green woollen pullover, '68 Patt. DPM combat jacket, nylon DPM waterproofs (not Gore-tex), dark blue beret, or DPM jungle hat. As the Bermuda Regiment receives no funding from the MOD, the local government pays for it entirely (and not over-generously..about $5 million a year, as I recollect). Consequently, the occassional talk around Warwick Camp about new rifles or other equipment has usaully turned out, for years, to be wishful thinking. The one piece of kit most in need of replacement is the rifle. The Ruger Mini-14 replaced the 7.62mm SLR in the 1980s. Though retrofitted with new stocks, the Rugers have never been loved, and are all rather long in the tooth, now.

Aodhdubh 21:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is this "The Bermuda Regiment is listed in the British Army Order of Battle as number 28 in order of precedence."? I assume this refers to a list of regiments by precedence (seniority), rather than an orbat. Aodhdubh (talk) 03:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Order of Precedence for the Army and within the Infantry, 09: Honours, Awards, Royal and Ceremonial Events, Defence Instruction and Notices released 1 August 2007, MoD PS12(A), Reference: 2007DIN09-027 and Army General and Admin Instructions, Volume 2, Chapter 69, Legal Matters (AGAI69) dated August 2017 and page 8/1-1, Chapeter 8, Ceremonial Part 1- Precedence, Precedence of Corps and Regiments, paragraph 8.001., The Queen's Regulations for thee Army 1975, Admendment 37, dated May 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-queens-regulations-for-the-army-1975-amendment-number-37 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RBR77 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The image

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conscription is or was common internationally. There are various criticisms of conscription, but this is the first time that I have read that it is criticised for "its similarity to slavery". Is that actually the basis for criticism in Bermuda - and elsewhere?203.184.41.226 (talk) 03:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that conscription is "frequently" criticised by Bermudians, to judge from my reading of local papers. As for "aware foreigners", it is none of their business! "Sexism and its similarity to slavery" are unlikely to be common reasons for criticism, since they are both bizarre.203.184.41.226 (talk) 06:12, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What does "this leaves the force dependent on the qualities of senior officers,[citation needed] whereas similar units – the British Army, in particular, upon which the Regiment is modelled – emphasise the initiative of junior members" mean? All armies based on the British model emphasise both quality of leaders and the initiative of junior members. This has nothing to do with conscription.Royalcourtier (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060310074814/http://www.regiments.org:80/regiments/atlantic/volmil/inf/bm-regt.htm to http://www.regiments.org/regiments/atlantic/volmil/inf/bm-regt.htm
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060418184608/http://www.army.mod.uk/ra/gunnernet/association_branches.htm to http://www.army.mod.uk/ra/gunnernet/Association_Branches.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080117143359/http://www.lawinfo.com:80/index.cfm/fuseaction/News.story/msgID/AB1BC634-FE1B-4B0D-AA89-61DC155302CF to http://www.lawinfo.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/News.story/msgID/AB1BC634-FE1B-4B0D-AA89-61DC155302CF
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929003820/http://www.dpitcher.com/2007/01/first_week_of_r.html to http://www.dpitcher.com/2007/01/first_week_of_r.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—