Talk:Russell–Einstein Manifesto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Formulation of the manifesto

It would be good to detail how the manifesto was formulated. I drafted this, but until the rest is there, this shouldn't be either.

Einstein's last letter

When flying from Rome to Paris on April 18, Russell learned of Einstein's death and recounted in his autobiography that he was "shattered" by the news. Upon arrival at his Paris hotel he received a letter from Einstein, dated April 11, 1955. It was Einstein's last public act, in which he endorsed the manifesto.

Dear Bertrand Russell,
Thank you for your letter of April 5. I am gladly willing to sign your excellent statement. I also agree with your choice of the prospective signers.
With kind regards, A. Einstein

With Einstein's passing the text of the manifesto was fixed, lest Einstein be lost from the signatories.

Daniel Collins 21:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with dates

"The Russell-Einstein Manifesto was issued in

nuclear weapons and called for world leaders to seek peaceful resolutions to international conflict. It was signed by 11 preeminent intellectuals and scientists, most notably Albert Einstein, days before his death on April 18
, 1955."

How could Einstein have signed this manifesto in July 1955 if he had died two and a half months earlier?

the synopsis section

Should there not be a link to the full text of the manifesto - maybe the Pugwash site itself? [http://www.pugwash.org/about/manifesto.htm]

It might be worth noting that the possibility of mutually assured destruction (MAD) was foreseen in the manifesto. Although the term/acronym was not then used, its use became relatively common in later years. It is said to be largely through the continued efforts of scientists worldwide to explain this consequence to political leaders that subsequent use of nuclear weapons was averted. Davy p 02:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the full text link is there in External links: https://pugwash.org/1955/07/09/statement-manifesto/ and yours is a dead link. "It is said," has no attribution - maybe the brainy guys influenced the politicians, but who said that they did? - 173.24.116.102 (talk) 00:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Science associations and Eugene Rabinowitch

The Federation of American Scientists in the USA and the Atomic Scientists Association in the UK both deserve a mention, as does Eugene Rabinowitch. Rotblat, in his account, says of him "it is largely due to his enthusiasm and devotion that many of the events recorded here have materialized." Davy p 16:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signatories

I've added the word 'included:' in the sub-head. Jo Rotblat uses this when he lists signatories, so presumaby a fair few scientists and others had offered support. Those listed in the manifesto were either Nobel Prize winning physicists or otherwise well known.

I simply added mention of Rotblat's book, Science and World Affairs, from which I took an excerpt, to the references section. I suppose this should be a footnote but a) a single Notes heading for footnotes with just one reference would look cluttered; and b) I haven't yet figured out how to use footnotes. Davy p 17:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Russell–Einstein Manifesto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]