Talk:SKATS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Military use

I've got this suspicion that not a lot of external sources are going to happen for this article, since AFAIK about the only users of SKATS are the US and South Korean militaries. (Maybe Korean amateur radio operators, too?) Is that where people who have edited this article are getting their information; their own military experience? ARE there even any unclassified primary SKATS sources in English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.121.47.89 (talk) 02:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Does SKATS predate Korean typewriters?

I changed the sentence that said “SKATS dates back to the days before the Korean keyboard was developed”. 이원익 built early Korean typewriters in 1900 and again in 1910. 공병우 built better typewriters in 1949 and in 1950. When was SKATS developed?—Wikipeditor 14:23, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikipeditor: In case you're still interested, Korean Morse code was developed somewhere between approximately 1884 and 1886, and standardized in 1888, according to this. [1] (Korean only but can machine translate) It says the only change since then has been the addition of ㅔ and ㅐ, which are written as digraphs in this article [TU and EU] but have their own codes [Y and Q] in other charts, such as on Korean Wikipedia). —Pengo 07:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M

What happened to the M?


I Added The Mium (M)

The Mium is clearly a part of the Korean alphabet (Hangul) and should not have been omitted from the chart with a reference in another part of the page to it being represented by an M.

Fixed the chart

I changed "에" and "애" to "ㅔ" and "ㅐ." According to the way it had been written the SKATS part would have had to say KTU and KEU and not follow the pattern of the rest of the examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.133.1.228 (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://moisant3.no-ip.biz/morse.html#korean
    Triggered by \bno-ip\. on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—

NotifyOnline 17:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]