Talk:SR Lord Nelson class
.svg){kind=small} | The good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page .
Date: 02:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
Good article nominee | Listed | |
| August 11, 2008 | Good article reassessment | Kept |
| May 14, 2022 | Good article reassessment | Kept |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
- herefor criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
Again, a good article. Perhaps more wikiliking but not a pre-requisite of GA, so, pass. The Rambling Man 17:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
SR Lord Nelson class
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Multiple passages missing citations. Several existing citations are missing page numbers. I am not convinced that "Southern Railway E-mail Group" is a reliable source. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)