Talk:Samjna (concept)

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion

	good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

Saṃjñā. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ

for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121205090810/http://www.zolag.co.uk/Cetasikas/ to http://www.zolag.co.uk/Cetasikas/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saranyu, a Hindu goddess (For sources, see that article). Another point is the removal of sanskritised letters (as per WP:COMMON NAME) .💠245CMR💠.•^👥📜 15:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Oppose no reason to remove accents on Sanskrit terms; and
Samjna doesn't need (Buddhism) either. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

@In ictu oculi: The direct meaning of Samjna from Sanskrit is "noun", "sign" or "name". This Samjna is not the only primary terms, so it is necessary to move it. Btw, the most popular use of Samjna is the grammatical use of Sanskrit-Hindi (samjna), and also Saranyu has far more veiws. .💠245CMR💠.•^👥📜 03:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The scope of this article is not restricted to Buddhism, and there is no reason to change it. Andrewa (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrewa All topics are equally important and non of them is a Primary topic. Eg, the word orange means the colour and the fruit, so leads to a disambiguation page. .💠245CMR💠.•^👥📜 15:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this approach but it is not current policy. Even I would not go as far as to say All topics are equally important but I certainly agree we would do far better to say none of them is a Primary topic, see User:Andrewa/Primary Topic RfC.

But while I am continuing to develop this proposal and hope it will eventually become policy, I do not see it happening any time soon. It probably needs

generational change. Andrewa (talk) 19:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.