Talk:Sankei Shimbun

Japan: Business and economy / Tokyo Mid‑importance

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Business and economy task force.

This article is supported by the Tokyo task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Journalism Low‑importance

Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article needs to be filled out and/or updated. There are meaningful differences between the Yomiuri's political positions and the Sankei's (particularly on Yasukuni), and the characterization of the Asahi's positions makes them sound like the People's Daily, which they decidedly aren't (their sister paper in South Korea is the conservative Dong-A Ilbo). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mblack (talk • contribs) 07:26, 2 March 2006

6th or one of 5?

There is something strange here; in

Asahi Shimbun it's said that Sankei Shimbun is one of the 5 greater newspapers; but in this article it says that it's the 6th. Mauricio Kanno 04:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Chunichi Shimbun's circulation is higher than Sankei's[1], but the latter is considered a major since Chunichi is regional.--Julián Ortega - drop me a message 13:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection, again?

This page may have to be protected, again. The history page shows repeated attempts to vandalize it by IP addresses. Historiador (talk) 08:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sankei Shimbun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

産経新聞.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Political Alignment Section Should Only Include Strong Sources

The political alignment section is not a place to add "Japanese nationalism" then link to one 14-year-old article in a policy journal. It's a sensitive topic. If your sources are better than Reuters, AFP and AP, which all, in the past few years, have called Sankei "conservative", then they should appear before that label. Currently, the "right-wing" label is sourced from an English-language Japanese newspaper and a think tank piece. Those sources do not deserve to sit above the world's major wire services. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.181.23.211 (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Sankei Shimbun is a nationalist media outlet. However, since there is room for dispute, I will not specify it in "Infobox".--삭은사과 (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]