Talk:Saturn (magazine)

	Saturn (magazine) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 13, 2021.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 17, 2020 Featured article candidate Promoted

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Magazines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Per a search at https://cocatalog.loc.gov/, the only issue that had copyright renewed is the October 1957 issue. The other covers are all public domain. The stories may have had copyright renewed independently. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that an editor added an infobox, but it was removed, and the editor was directed to the talk page to gain consensus before the addition of the infobox. I would support an infobox, but I wanted to see what the consensus was. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think magazine infoboxes are most useful when they can summarize useful information. Here there's very little that can be said that's helpful to the reader. The genre, editor, frequency and title all vary too much to include. Some things are fixed -- the publisher and format, for example -- but those are likely to be of little interest to a reader. I looked at the infobox that was added (this version) and I think the category of "science fiction magazine" would have to be removed. The other fields are accurate (first and last dates, country, publisher location, language), but all of that except the publisher location is clear from the first ten words of the article. If the category were removed, I think the remaining infobox would be harmless, though in my experience editors come along and try to add the other details. So I'm opposed, but not very strongly so. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should 'Web Detective Stories' be italicised in the lede section, like all the other titles? Regards,

Yes, done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The editor of this magazine wasn’t the same person as R. C. Sproul, right? That would certainly be very weird if they were one and the same, but stranger things have happened (such as that the author of Space Relations was also headmaster of a children’s school at the time). 2604:2D80:6986:4000:0:0:0:F6 (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The dates make it unlikely, but in addition, R. C. Sproul's article says his father was also named Robert, but this Sproul's father was named Joe. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thanks for pointing that out. 2604:2D80:6986:4000:0:0:0:F6 (talk) 23:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]