This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
has the creator commented on what he thinks of this character and where the character has gone since creation?
how are the rights of the character handled. Is disney the sole owner of the character and all films and movies of their production? if not, how is giving the rights handled? WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?
A Carl Barks picture is "fair use"? The image isn't dated, no provenance or context is given for it, thus none of the article's commentary on Scrooge's changing appearance and personality relates to it. Moreover, the article is appropriately encyclopedic, which means it does not exactly discuss Bark's work "critically".
The "External links" used as references need to be called out into their own section,
A running gag is the Beagle Boys trying to steal Scrooge McDuck's Money-the one time they nearly succeded by legal means-until they failed the final test-of diving into the money bin-Scrooge's head was much harder than theirs!
Scrooge McDuck loves mince pie-although it gives him nightmares {i.e. Losing wealth} Disney Golden Key Comic Digest # 21 April 1970 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.5.89.228 (talk) 12:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Scrooge's net worth in "The Magic Hourglass"
According to the article, in the story "The Magic Hourglass": Scrooge starts losing one billion dollars each minute, and comments that he will go bankrupt within 600 years.
I just calculated that this means Scrooge's net worth is about 3.1536 * 1017 dollars, meaning 315.36 quadrillion dollars (
long scale). JIP | Talk 13:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
DuckTales (2017): Scrooge is Webby's Father (via cloning)
During the series finale of DuckTales 2017, it was revealed that Webby Vanderquack was Scrooge McDuck's daughter (via cloning). This is only canon to the 2017 DuckTales (however Webby barely appears outside of both DuckTales series). Should we add that Webby is Scrooge's daughter via cloning to the infobox on this article, or should we keep it the same?
Absolutely! Honestly,I think that you should make separate articles on DuckTales (1987) and (2017). 71.31.176.124 (talk) 03:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could someone review the latest edit on 6/8/2021?
Done by 2600:1700:2c55:0:41cc:36c6:48a3:cf0e on 6 August 2021 regarding Scrooge's age, I don't think its accurate information which should be reverted but could someone double check before reverting the information? Thanks KtMystic (talk) 06:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To me it looked like complete nonsense, probably vandalism. I have reverted the edit. JIP | Talk 14:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
