Talk:Second Battle of Panipat

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 5, 2020.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Military history: Asian / South Asia C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force South Asian military history task force

• Hemu's coronation. It is there in the background.
• Akbar being stationed away from the battle field. It is there in the sub-topic of the actual battle.
• Details of Humayun's death are unnecessary.
• The ruler was seeking to expel Mughals from India? More likely for the Delhi throne.
• Hemu's activities in Bengal.
• The title of Samrat is bestowed on a warrior who has not lost any war. This should come on the page for 'Samrat'
• That Hemu started coins in his name and appointed many Hindus at important positions. Should be on the page for Hemu.
• 'thus changing history' (after his eye was struck by an arrow)

Salilb (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the heck is this reading according to the Bollywood film Jodhaa Akbar? Akbar gladly hacked away at Hemu, but being a lad was unable to remove his head. Thus, Bairam Khan obliged and took off his head.

No sources are given so you should promptly cite a stupid Bollywood movie as your source if you're going to write such fallacy.

I'll provide more accurate details with sources soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.72.61 (talk) 23:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is blind sided Hemu page. It says about Hemu only and how great he was... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.120.73.18 (talk) 13:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like one of the user is intent on giving this a hindu vs muslim colour. There have been alliances between Hindu kings and muslim kings. Muslim kings have fought each other, so giving a Hindu-muslim colour is unjustified.Air Warrior (talk) 13:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]