Talk:Self-referential humor/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
July 2004
I did clean up the grammar but after reading that... is it really self-referential humour? Methinks not... but I don't know what to suggest. MDCore 12:27, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Me also thinks not. The current stub seems to be describing in-jokes instead. I'll replace it with a different stub that's IMO correct and see what happens. Bryan 02:33, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Cite article itself as source
This might be a bit silly, but it would form a great example for the article, wouldn't harm the encyclopedia, and would probably make someone smile. Calumapplepie (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
NO TALK PAGES!
created by Heckena (talk) 15:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- No creating new user accounts! Atomic putty? Rien! (talk) (talk) 16:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
:!!!! No sockpuppetry! 64.158.211.162 (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
"Joke Template" section title potentially misleading (and also unsourced)
The Wikipedia search, along with automate internal links for
Joke cycle
As a side-note, the section
Joke template is backed by only one source which is a dead link I couldn't find on the Wayback Machine, so I'm unable to find any standard name for this type of self-referential humor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StereoFolic (talk • contribs
) 15:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)