Talk:Sexual abuse scandal in the English Benedictine Congregation

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Catholicism Low‑importance Sexual abuse scandal in the English Benedictine Congregation is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. defunct .Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch articles

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Material from Ealing Abbey was split to Sexual abuse scandal in the English Benedictine Congregation on January 21 2010. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Ealing Abbey.

There is apparent confusion in the reference about dates - did he leave the Abbey in 1992 or 1993? Springnuts (talk) 09:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this heading for two reasons. 1. There is no school called "Worth Abbey School". The school at Worth Abbey is called "Worth School". 2. The heading has no content, and therefore looks a little like a "fishing expedition", a use to which I don't think Wiki should be put. If the originator of the heading has something to say, perhaps s/he could say it? Thanks Lanspergius (talk) 19:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There have been no public allegations against Worth Abbey as regards sexual abuse, although the monastery has been mistakenly listed in a Guardian article among those which have received such. The verbal consensus among the wider Catholic clergy is that this was owing to the monastery having had a much better policy of not allowing casual contact between school and monastery, and of being careful with placing "unsound" monks in the former. However, this cannot be included in the Wikipedia article because nothing has been published. Basilwatkinsosb (talk) 06:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After the recent good cleanup work by several editors, should the Downside Abbey section be reinstated? There is a long section on child abuse in the Downside School article, largely duplicated in Downside Abbey. Wire723 (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it should. The evidence being presented to the national enquiry on child abuse is clearly notable, as was the previous material which should never have been removed. Peteinterpol (talk) 13:49, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]