Talk:Sharanga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Requested move 30 December 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. If the article on the place in Russia is created, this can be revisited to determine a primary topic. Number 57 17:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Number 57 17:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



WP:PRECISE. Sharanga was moved to Sharanga (Hindu mythology) and a disambig was created at Saranga. Besides the Hinduism article, it has only a red link – Redtigerxyz Talk 19:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Saranga and Sharanga are different spellings. There is 1 blue link at the disambig. Sharanga in Russia is a red link currently. A google search follows [1] many searches deal with the bow, rather than the town. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The initial move should have been done through a consensus building process. Any determination in a
    WP:TWODABS case should require discussion, because it is a determination about the primacy of a topic. In any case, there is nothing here that can not be resolved with a hatnote. Both articles are short, so there is not even a likelihood of disruption for readers with slow servers. bd2412 T 17:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

New article proposed - "Weapons of power in Hindu epics"

Discussion of a proposed consolidated Weapons of power in Hindu epics article is at Talk:Kurukshetra War#New article proposed - "Weapons of power in Hindu epics". --Bejnar (talk) 16:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 August 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Participants were not convinced by the arguments laid out in the nomination; the

WP:CONSISTENT argument was undercut by the fact that the title Śārṅgadeva is not actually aligned with the proposed title, and it was noted that IAST spellings are not frequently used for titling articles on Hindu mythology topics. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 14:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]


talk) 15:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

In my experience, the majority of articles on Hindu mythology do not conform to the IAST spelling, so this is not a compelling argument. Even then, the accurate spelling would be Śārṅga, not Sharnga. I don't see why this article needs to be an exception to the rule. As for the removed reference, most of the article employs wisdom library, which I have realised is not a reliable source. I will work on finding reliable ones to improve the article quality. Chronikhiles (talk) 02:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
WikiProject Hinduism has been notified of this discussion. —Usernamekiran_(AWB) (talk) 22:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Note:
WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. —Usernamekiran_(AWB) (talk) 22:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.