Talk:Sharda River
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sharda River article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
History
Done - merge content from
]called Sharda in upper sections?
Does anyone call the upper part of this river Sharda? I mean the part along Uttarakhand-Nepal border? If not, why not note the name change in the introduction and call it (Maha)Kali consistently until the point where the name changes? LADave (talk) 15:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110111071743/http://www.southasianmedia.net:80/magazine/journal/11_indo-nepal_water.htm to http://www.southasianmedia.net/magazine/journal/11_indo-nepal_water.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110721171208/http://kheri.nic.in/dudwa/dudwa.htm to http://kheri.nic.in/dudwa/dudwa.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110823074644/http://www.nea.org.np:80/gen.php to http://nea.org.np/gen.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
Content from Kali River
The page at Kali River needs to be restored to a disambiguation page, so I'm putting the entire text from that article here. It's clearly the same waterway as Sharda River, so if any of this can be merged here, please feel free to do so. — Gorthian (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- The Kali River or Sharda River, also known as "Kutiyangdi" by locals, is a river in Ghaghra River (referred to in Nepal as Karnali River).[1]
- The river has significant hydro-power potential, and hence the joint Pancheswor Multipurpose Project has been agreed upon by India and Nepal. The project addresses storage issues and has been designed to generate more than 6000 MW of electricity. While also creating significant benefits of irrigation, the reservoir controls monsoon floods and provides regulated flows downstream.[2]
References
- ^ Indusnettechnologies, Goutam Pal, Dipak K S, SWD. "Rivers : District of Pithoragarh , Uttarakhand, India". pithoragarh.nic.in. Retrieved 2015-10-05.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ shahnawaz sheikh
Source of Sarada or Mahakali
Source of Mahakali or Kali River in the western border of Nepal is not the Kalapani, it originates from Limpiyadhura. River Sarada is one of the tributaries of Mahakali. Sarada is not synonymous to Kali or Mahakali. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcumesh (talk • contribs) 03:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- You need to provide a WP:RS for this claim !! -- BhagyaMani (talk) 05:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)]
Kuti Yangti
Kuti Yangti (ཀུཏེ ནག་པོ།) is upper part of the Kali river. ཀུཏེ ནག་པོ། (Kuti Yangti) is tibetic name which is combination of two words ཀུཏེ (Kuti) and ནག་པོ། (Yangti). Kuti is the name of village located near the river and Yangti (ནག་པོ།) means dark or black. Yangti in Tibetan, Kali in Nepali and Black in English are same word in different languages, so Yangti is Kali and Kali is Sharda. [1]-- 👤Raju💌 07:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, but there are many Yankti's [2] and even in Tibet [3].
- You need to watch yourself now. Too much ]
- What too much, you are threatening me? I have not changed any content of any aricle even I know much of content in these articles are falls. Sources linked with article are not necessary to be correct. There can be own point of view of the writer and I don't care about any articles on wikipedia either content are correct or not but I just want to bring attention to you or other that there are also other meaning available of the same word and you should also check them.
- Jhuling Yankti and Phula yankti in THE HIMALAYAN GAZETTEER vol-3 are not river they are passes between Yankti (Yankti valley) and Dhauli valley and Darma valley. From these passes one can pass to the yankti valley that's why these passes must be named combining "Yankti", though they were old name but those names are no more in use now. -- 👤Raju💌 03:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- How very interesting ! And who told you that "much of content in these articles are falls" ? How do you know? Please provide a source. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 06:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Jhuling Yankti and Phula yankti in THE HIMALAYAN GAZETTEER vol-3 are not river they are passes between Yankti (Yankti valley) and Dhauli valley and Darma valley. From these passes one can pass to the yankti valley that's why these passes must be named combining "Yankti", though they were old name but those names are no more in use now. -- 👤Raju💌 03:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)