Talk:Sheffield City Council

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Yorkshire Low‑importance Sheffield City Council is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oops, should have made that table 90degrees the other way round.

I am going to start/have started a few articles about prominent councils - see list at User:Morwen/councils to see what we have already. I think we can have X and X City Council, but probably should merge Y (district) and Y district council or Metropolitan Borough of Z and Z Borough Council. That is, there can be maybe three things

• the core place
• the district
• the council of the district

but we would only ever have two articles. In the case of Oadby and Wigston we'd merge the council article into that, as well. This is because I don't think district articles are going to ever have enough content - certainly many of them at the moment are only few sentences. Obviously if content gets too big we would split out. Morwen - Talk 16:42, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like a good idea, although like you say, decisions on merging or splitting articles will need to depend in part on their length. For instance, Sheffield City Council could have fitted into the Sheffield article quite comfortably, as it already covers the district, but as it is a fair length and the Sheffield article is pretty long, it makes sense to have this separate article. I suppose you could ask whether the district really exists, except as the Council or as lines on a map, but people do regard them as different concepts. In essence - go for it! Warofdreams talk 17:43, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sheffield City Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20131129160602/https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/business-economy/contracts/Major-Contracts.html to https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/business-economy/contracts/Major-Contracts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]