Talk:Siberia (Lights album)

	Siberia (Lights album) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 21, 2020 Good article nominee Not listed

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Canada: Music Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music. project's importance scale .

Pop music Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Albums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Siberia (Lights album)/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Will review this album shortly later. --K. Peake 09:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but this is being failed already. The article is far from broad in its coverage, with the lack of a music and lyrics section as well as a promotion section. The commercial performance one is only two sentences long; I believe in its current state, the article will not be able to reach GA level of broadness after a week. Also, the prose is poorly written and the entire personnel section is unreferenced. Citations are included in the lead which violations MOS, while the release history section is laid out incorrectly too. Take a look at the good article criteria if you are unsure. --K. Peake 10:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]