Talk:Siege of Lyme Regis

Siege of Lyme Regis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 13, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Siege of Lyme Regis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that during the Siege of Lyme Regis, women disguised themselves as men to fool the enemy? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Lyme Regis.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dorset High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

I am confused by the sentence "He immediately set about removing those with Royalist loyalists from the area...", but I'm not sure what to replace it with?— Rod ^talk 17:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, typo, it should have been "loyalties". Good spot, cheers! Harrias ^talk 17:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]