Talk:Sky Replay

Television: British / Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Uncontroversial, so Move Parsecboy (talk) 13:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sky2 — Official Sky sources state Sky2 — Yellow Mage (talk) 07:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since
Wikipedia's naming conventions
.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request. A history swap has been done.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:45, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sky 1. Unreal7 (talk) 15:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Support this seems like an uncontroversial followup.--69.157.253.74 (talk) 22:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom - We should be consistent with articles like Sky 1/2 etc. –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I almost moved this when I closed the Sky 1 RM, but a) there was no note on this talk page about that RM, and b) the history of Sky 2 needs to be preserved for attribution as it has been merged into the current
Sky2 article. What we should do with that old history has actually been the subject of a recent small discussion, see Talk:Node of Ranvier#Page history of merged article. Jenks24 (talk) 14:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Split proposed

Sky 2, the 1996/7 channel is a completely separate channel to the new Sky 2/Two channel. Joey (TattooedLeprechaun) • 💬 13:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think this makes sense although if the article was to be split then the new article for the original Sky 2 would need some independent references. Rillington (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. You've got an idea. Just need to find some sources for it. Jcb cummings (talk) 18:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Sky Replay DE Logo 2021.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]