Talk:Social Media Examiner
 | Michael Stelzner was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 May 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Social Media Examiner. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social Media Examiner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
contact us if the issue is urgent. |
COI
This article is among several under discussion at
WP:COIN, per its creator's general declaration of paid editing, which has not been disclosed for this article in particular. I have tagged the article for COI. The tag should only be removed by an independent editor after he or she has reviewed the article for NPOV, sourcing, and NOTABILITY; who ever does that, please leave a note here. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 11:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
]
- I have copy-edited the article with particular attention to sources, and I believe that it no longer exhibits POV, sourcing, or notability problems. I have therefore removed the COI tag. Neelix (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Disclosure
I am a paid editor and created this page for Social Media Examiner. Djhuff (talk) 11:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)