Talk:Speak Now World Tour – Live
Speak Now World Tour – Live has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 8, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Taylor Swift said that her first live album, Speak Now World Tour – Live, was meant to capture what she wanted to "show [...] my kids and my grandkids"? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expansion
Here's credits and a review from Allmusic.
Here is a review from Roughstock.
This might help from Taste of Country.com
- Hope this'll help expand it. This is all I can find for now. User talk:RickyBryant45324 02:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)]
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Speak Now World Tour – Live/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sebbirrrr (talk · contribs) 18:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Placeholder.
Infobox and lead
- Use bullet points instead of {{plainlist}} for the length
- "is a live album" → is this Swift's first, second, third, etc. live album?
- "DVD or Blu-ray" → shouldn't it be "and" instead of "or"?
- It was released on either DVD or Blu-Ray. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)]
- It was released on either DVD or Blu-Ray.
- "save for two" → not sure what this is supposed to mean
- "save for" means "except"; it is a vocabulary used in the Slant article. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)]
- "save for" means "except"; it is a vocabulary used in the Slant article.
- The sentence describing the tracks is quite long, try to split it
- "was supported by" → from the way it is worded it suggests that "Long Live" was released to promote the album
- "Brazilian singer-songwriter" → I recommend sticking with just "Brazilian singer" as it doesn't seem Fernandes is known for being a singer-songwriter
- "has sold 368,000 copies" → as of?
- "additionally entered the top 30 on charts in Australia—where it was certified triple platinum by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA), Canada, and Japan." → try to reword, it sounds like it was also certified in Australia by Canada and Japan (?)
Done Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Background and release
- Ref 7 doesn't state that the album was released in Asia (maybe only in India?)
- Not sure how ref 8 states that it was released in Europe
Done Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Content
- Keefe's comment sounds more like a (critical) review of the album
- Trimmed a bit. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)]
- Trimmed a bit.
Done Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Critical reception
- The Newcastle Heraldis a tabloid, I don't think it should be used for album reviews
- Tabloid here means the Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)]
- That's fine then. However, looking at The Daily Telegraph's article, I doubt that it is a reliable source considering it was at one point the least trusted newspaper in Australia Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Tabloid here means the
- "found the CD rather typical" → I think "typical" should be in quotes
- "but said that "Ours" was disappointing" → McDonnell found "Ours"'s performance disappointing, not the song itself
- According to the ref, Carlos Olivares Baró is the reviewer for Notimex
Commercial performance
- Saying that peaked within the top 30 is enough, the peaks don't have to be put in brackets
Done Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Charts
- The ref for Japan's peak position is dead
- Not sure why the songs's chart performance is included here as they can be found at Taylor Swift singles discography instead
Not done The chart performance table for the songs should be removed. Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Release history
- Shouldn't there be one of these as it was released for different formats?
Done
Certifications
- Shouldn't the heading say Certifications for Speak Now World Tour – Live ?
Not done Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
References
- Copyvio at 46.2% but that's because of the album's credits. However, I recommend trimming Keefe's quote down as it sits at 37%
- Source check: 3, 7, 8, 9, 18, 23, 26, 28, 32, 33
- According to ref 9 the press release comes from unreliable
- Ref 32 is dead
- As I mentioned while reviewing "Ours", I'm unsure about Roughstock's reliability
- It has an editorial board, was included as one of the sources for academic research by an American college, and its content was used by the Society for American Music. Ippantekina (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)]
- It has an editorial board, was included as one of the sources for academic research by an American college, and its content was used by the Society for American Music.
Outcome
- @Ippantekina: On hold for 7 days; article needs just a few tweaks! Sebbirrrr (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)]
- @Ippantekina (talk) 05:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)]
- @]
- Hi, thanks so much for the review and your patience. Except where I responded, I have addressed your comments. Let me know if this article needs further work asap, because I might not be able to reach back after the weekend. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 01:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)]
- @Ippantekina: Don't worry! Thanks for addressing my comments. There are two points that were not addressed and I left a comment about one of the sources under Critical reception. Greets, Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)]
- Thanks, I have addressed the two remaining points. Regarding the Australian Telegraph, I removed it based on the many controversies it received; its sensationalism is reminiscent of the Ippantekina (talk) 15:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)]
- Thanks, I have addressed the two remaining points. Regarding the Australian Telegraph, I removed it based on the many controversies it received; its sensationalism is reminiscent of the
- @
- Hi, thanks so much for the review and your patience. Except where I responded, I have addressed your comments. Let me know if this article needs further work asap, because I might not be able to reach back after the weekend. Cheers,
- @]
- @
Hello, I have spent some spare time during my trip addressing some issues, but please expect me to be done by this weekend. Thank you for your patience!