Talk:Springfield Model 1892–99

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The image

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• Image:US Krag M1892 rifle.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to my sources - primarily the book "the American Krag Rifle and Carbine" by Joe Poyer,

While the title needs improvement, the US series of Krag rifles have a large and unique history from the Danish and Norwegian rifles. As a user has already noted in the talk section over there, the info and emphasis on the US rifles seem to push out the Scandinavian Krags. As I said over there, combining the two articles would be like combining the various Mauser articles into just "Mauser (rifle)" -- it wouldn't present either the American or the Scandinavian families of rifles clearly. TeamZissou (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sources I most rely on refer to this rifle as the U.S. Krag (year), the U.S. Model (year) (Krag-Jorgensen), or simply the Krag. Model (year) may be 1892, 1896, 1898, etc. I am not finding authoritative sources refering to this rifle as a Springfield; in fact, where they use 'Springfield rifle' by itself, the ref is usually to the Model 1903 .30-03 or .30-06 rifles and not to the Krag .30-40 rifle. Naaman Brown (talk) 16:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sources your sources are citing refer to it as a Springfield, as that's what it's commonly called in government documents from the 1890s to WWI. Today, we generally refer to these rifles by "M189x Krag".TeamZissou (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 1903 Springfield served as standard issue from 1903 up until the Garand was adopted in the late 1930s, and was still a "standard arm" up until the end of the war, in front line use in the early years. How could it "tie" with a rifle that only served 11 years? If there was some difference in the early models of 1903 that they changed on the adoption of the .30-06, that might explain it...but that would be a service period of 3 years, and I've never heard of this, or of them changing the designation...it's still the same rifle. AnnaGoFast (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Oh, I sort of see..."with the introduction of the M1093 the rifle is tied with the shortest service life..." - just confusingly written. Meaning "when it was replaced, it became one of the shortest-serving weapons, etc" - tied with what? Couldn't this be written better? AnnaGoFast (talk) 05:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]