Talk:Status offense

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Discrimination Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

It seems to me that this article is totally wrong. A status offence is where a person is liable, not for their actions, ie. vandalism, but for their state, ie. being on private premises for an unlawful purpose. Anyone care to voice an opinion on this? --Matthew Proctor 01:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article isn't totally off-base. One definition I found online is "A type of crime that is not based upon prohibited action or inaction but rests on the fact that the offender has a certain personal condition or is of a specified character."[1] So the juvenile-focus of this article isn't totally off; however, it could be more well rounded. There is a subset of law that is specific to "juvenile status offense". U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c)(2) states that a juvenile status offense is a crime which can not be committed by an adult, i.e. possession of a firearm by a minor. That cannot be done by an adult.[2] "Juvenile status offenders are distinguished from juvenile delinquent offenders. Status offenders have not committed an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult; delinquent youths have committed such an act."[3] In Wyoming, the term "status offense" does not apply to adults at all; according to their law, it is only for under-18s.[ http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2006/interim/jud/BILLS/07lso-0076w2.pdf] So this article is clearly biased, but not completely off-base. I do not have the desire to search out the legalese this article would require to make it good, but I will watch it and contribute if possible. - Freechild 17:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed my mind a little; I'll add what I found here to spark anyone else to contribute more. - Freechild 17:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article, as the discussion above and the editing history demonstrates, needs a cleanup. There are red links, grmmar problems, editing mistakes, etc. When I have time, I'll make some fixes. Bearian 22:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did it myself. Bearian 12:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]