Talk:Sufficiency of disclosure
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060219101349/http://www.skgf.com/media/news/news.204.pdf to http://www.skgf.com/media/news/news.204.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
{{source check- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
Talk to my owner:Online 10:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
]
US-centric
I wholly support the allegations of US-centric nature of the 2023-05-19 version of the article. However, I do not have an expertise to write about non-US points of view. My limited experience tells me, that European Patent Convention does not have similar duality, and that the case law in other countries is not well developed in this regard. I invite non-US patent law experts to contribute to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walter Tau (talk • contribs)