Talk:Superficial (album)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Superficial (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Comment
i dont think she knows what a double entendre is —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.46.88 (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Referencing problems
- The statement "Superficial was released on January 11, 2010" is not supported by the reference.[1]
Done. ]
- US Weekly can hardly be considered a reliable source.
- What is ref #17 " heidi-montag-lets-hang-miss-universe-performance" supposed to mean? Jezhotwells (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Done. ]
Orphaned references in Superficial (album)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Superficial (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "BPI":
- From List of music recording certifications: "The BPI". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 2008-06-02.
- From 21 (Adele album): "Certified Awards Search". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
- From : 4. Retrieved 16 July 2010.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
"Editing War"
Obviously, there's quite the "editing war" going on here. Improving Wiki pages is something I do when I'm sitting around the house with nothing better to do. That being said, I noticed that both the Heidi Montag page and the Superficial page looked pretty bad (no offense to whoever made it) compared to other articles. There's A LOT of info on both Montag and the album that wasn't featured in the article, so I input that information and modeled the page after other more popular albums. All of the information is sourced (and I'm not the one who stated that the album won a Grammy, and I also didn't post the charts and certifications). That being said, I think the article should stay the way I edited it. It's a good looking article, I believe, and all of the information is sourced, and most of the info I put in has more than one source. That being said, I'll quit reverting the edits until we come to a final decision.
- You can't use blogs and fansites to add information to the article, they are unreliable. That pretty much breaks the WP:V rule. Also, can you please sign your comments with the four tildes so people will know who it is that's commenting? Till 02:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)]
- I did not realize that I was using fansites, I only looked at the information included in the sourced articles! Sorry. /: Sethjohnson95 Talk 22:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- You additionally added the album charting at number one everywhere and selling billions of copies worldwide. Statυs (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't add that information to the page. I actually didn't even add a "Charts and Certifications" section, as it only charted on one chart (the Heatseekers chart) therefore I only covered that in the "reception" section. I also didn't say the album won a Grammy. When I reverted the edits back, I didn't notice those, but quickly removed them from the article.
- Forgot to add my sig. Sethjohnson95 Talk 23:26, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't add that information to the page. I actually didn't even add a "Charts and Certifications" section, as it only charted on one chart (the Heatseekers chart) therefore I only covered that in the "reception" section. I also didn't say the album won a Grammy. When I reverted the edits back, I didn't notice those, but quickly removed them from the article.
- You additionally added the album charting at number one everywhere and selling billions of copies worldwide. Statυs (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- I did not realize that I was using fansites, I only looked at the information included in the sourced articles! Sorry. /: Sethjohnson95 Talk 22:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- You can't use blogs and fansites to add information to the article, they are unreliable. That pretty much breaks the
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090628131851/http://celebrity.lovetoknow.com:80/Heidi_Montag_Unhappy_About_Song_Leak to http://celebrity.lovetoknow.com/Heidi_Montag_Unhappy_About_Song_Leak
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091025232905/http://www.amazon.com:80/Here-She-Is/dp/B002KU96U8 to http://www.amazon.com/Here-She-Is/dp/B002KU96U8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—