Talk:TMNT (film)

	TMNT (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 1, 2013 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Films / Computer Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). Animated Comics: Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Comic book films work group. inactive .Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles

If we could get a link to where it was stated Shredder wouldn't be in it that would be great - not saying it's false, it will just be good to have.

The problem with that, is that it was not mentioned in an online interview or something of that matter, but in the letters page of the TMNT comic book (I forget which issue, but it's a very recent one). The S 03:26, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. Thanks for the heads up. Tigermave 03:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

actually its been confirmed no Shredder and karai only a small role, my source? the technodrome forums posted by Murphy and Kevin themselves. 72.161.18.90

It's timing with the other three films in this article is inconsistent with the timing of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_Mutant_Ninja_Turtles_(film_series) as that link describes it. Here, it takes place afterwards, in the other article, it is after the second. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.162.207 (talk) 21:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can anybody provide a reputable link that can prove the info about the soundtrack? I've tried searching for it but I can't find it anywhere. ONEder Boy 04:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As of now there has not been release of a soundtrack as of yet. As the movie is still in production and won't be released until spring of next year. If there is going to be a soundtrack, we won't know until winter of 2006 or spring of 2007. Since the movie is being produced through Warner Bros., chances are the soundtrack will be released through them. [Edit by Halfshell]

This film is gonna be rated PG? That's stupid, all the modern day super hero films are rated PG-13. Batmain Begins, Spiderman, The Fantastic Four, the X-Men ect. The only reason the original TMNT films were rated PG was because in the costumes the actors that play the Turtles don't have alot of mobility, so the fighting sequences, while still awesome, aren't extremely intense. But with CGI characters this movie can totally kick ass, easily making it have a PG-13 rating. I will be fairly disappointed if it isn't intense enough to earn a PG-13 rating.

Ah, you make a point there.

WRONG! Family-related CGI films do not get PG-13 ratings! It's too late because it has a PG rating.

No, this film isn't going to be released until next year. The rating could still change.

The news calls it "PG-rated", but if the rating could still change and I don't want this film to be rated PG-13, maybe it could be rated G instead because it's now animated.

To be rated as G would make this film horrible. It would need at least PG or above to keep the film from sucking.

I heard TMNT II was heavily censored for violence, which is why they barely used their weapons. Sad, eh?

This film has now been rated PG.

The article says the movie's tentative title is Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles IV. As much as I'd love for the francise to continue the numeration after the previous three movies, I have not yet heard the movie been referred to with "IV". Anyone have a source for the "IV"? --

I think the "IV", is to reflect a tenative numbering, the movie IS set in the same canon as the first two movies but the third holds the numbering this movie would likly hold. It would have been much easier if the film had a "Superman Returns"-style title to avoid all of this confusion. Dr. R.K.Z 2 June 2006

Would someone please provide a source that indicates the relationship between TMNT and the other three films, because as far as I'm aware, there's nothing to suggest that this film is in continuity with the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.53.192.71 (talk • contribs)

However, there is nothing to suggest that it is not a continuity of the other three films. The only mistakes would be minor continuity errors, that happen when a significant amount of time (oh, lets say 13 years) between movies. I agree that we do need references to suggest whether or not it is a continuation, but we have not heard from anyone that it isn't a continuation. Disinclination 04:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the TMNT cgi/animated does have some referring to the three live actions, in the part where Splinter places the Nightwatcher's (Raph's) helmet, the Shredder is on the shlef and the scepter is hung horizontally under the shelf of helmets. So please don't say there is no refferences in the CGI that has nothing reffering to the live action movies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halfshell (talk • contribs) 22:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that aprils apartment is the same as the one first shown in part 2.--MathUser2929 (talk) 02:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about Kurai? She's not int he film's but is in the 4KIDS cartoon series that was airing at the time this movy came out. ANd April is the same personality and design as that cartoon so im more inclined to say its ofr the cartoon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.58.131 (talk) 17:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the bit about the villains. It's definitely a bogus. Basically, Mirage Studios doesn't own the rights to the old cartoon. All the characters who weren't in the comics and in the old cartoon (Bebop, Rocksteady, Dimension X, Krang, Technodrome etc) don't belong to Mirage Studios, they belong to the studio that did the old cartoon. And there is no sign of the that studio being involved in the movie. Plus, about the soundtrack, that was also probably a bogus. I can't see them announcing the WHOLE soundtrack at this stage. Plus, in my opinion, the artists all suck (except U2) and don't sound very turtle-y. I mean, can you really picture the turtles kicking ass to Green Day?

Also, about the Shredder not being in the movie. I'll be honest with you, there is no specific source that says he won't be in it. BUT. The movie incorporates aspects of the first movie (the end of which Shredder was killed). So it is assumed that he is still dead, and he didn't come back from the dead in the second movie.

Lets recap here: "Mirage Studios doesn't own the rights to the old cartoon. All the characters who weren't in the comics and in the old cartoon (Bebop, Rocksteady, Dimension X, Krang, Technodrome etc) don't belong to Mirage Studios, they belong to the studio that did the old cartoon"

First of all, statement is false. Mirage Studios owns copyright to all character names. Fred Wolfe Productions own the production and Editing rights to the show not the characters.

[Edited By Halfshell]

They don't own the rights to the characters which appeared in the old cartoon and not the comics, hence why Bebop and Rocksteady and Dimension X and all that crap doesnt' appear in the new cartoon, which is what I was trying to say.

Bebop and Rocksteady among others don't appear in the new cartoon because Mirage does not want them to. Jay Verdi 11-24-2006

Nope, the official site says they actually do NOT have the rights to cartoon-exclusive characters. —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by 64.122.208.51 (talk) 17:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply

]

Should this article have been moved without discussion or citation? All the press and production information indicates that actual film will be called TMNT, not the full Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Can we get a citation for the name change? ThuranX 15:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I heard that it was canned. 67.188.172.165 02:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. You must be thinking of the John Woo TMNT project, or the Hallmark TV movie The S 18:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallmark was gonna do a movie? WTF? What was the premise.74.195.3.11 03:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

he was joking. ThuranX 05:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I wasn't. If you go back through Peter Laird's "Blast from the Past" articles (which are linked on the official site), you can see references to a TV movie that was being made for the Hallmark channel, including a prototype sculpt of Splinter's puppet/costume. The S 06:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb has it as Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles so maybe we should move it to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2007 film)....?

They've always had it like that. An already-existing discussion about this is found higher on this talk page. In any case, when the movie's finally released, we can change the title if it's different after all. --

Brandon Dilbeck 18:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

IMDb now lists the movie as TMNT. --(trogga) 23:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get a citation regarding this film as a definitive continuation of the previous, live action series? Thanks. ThuranX 02:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be part of the cartoons cause of the 4kids cartoon becaus eof Kurai, who was not in the films and also april and kasey have theyre apperances and personalities from that series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.58.131 (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the 2003 4kids series. the 4th season ended in 2004 with teh Shredder gone and Kurai his replacement. TMNT Came out in 2007, the things Kurai said and the Shredder being gone but " Not for long " Fits the way seaosn 4 left off, and season 5 didnt start till 2008. It is part of the tv show, it fits to perfect.

Michaelangelo sounds an awful lot like

I see someone listed what some of the actors in the trailer SOUND like. I think being subjective, this isn't something that should be on the main page of an article, but on the discussion page. Also, I see someone added Mako back. It is true that Mako was announced as the voice of splinter months ago, but unfortunately, he passed away of cancer, shortly thereafter, I think we need more concrete proof that mako is voicing splinter still, did he finish his lines? RobertHeadley 13:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see that http://www.aintitcool.com/?q=node/24228 basically confirms that mako is still involved, tho I don't see the reason to prematurely list the others.RobertHeadley 13:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please do not post unconfirmed information about who is in the movie. Just because a character sounds like a voice actor, doesn't mean they are. Get confirmation, then post, with a reference thank you RobertHeadley 12:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunetly, the reference you listed doesn't confirm KMR in the role at all, it only mentions that would be cool. IMDB, which is still a pretty loss source for information (pretty bad that the only canonically resource for movie credits is riddled with errors, does mention Grey DeLisle is in the movie, who knows what character she is playing tho. RobertHeadley 06:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there was one voice actor who returned, Jim Cummings played characters in the first three films and I believe he voiced the robber/common criminal in this installment. Silent_Assasin2 7:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Quinton Flynn himself confirmed he was voicing Casey Jones in this film. So why was he scrapped for Chris Evans? The S 20:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have any confirmation that the music in the first trailer is actually a remix of Rimsky-Korsakov? The string line near the end is very similar in rhythm and interval but I don't think it justifies calling this a remix. So... remove? The beuks 02:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, this is defniitely a continuation of the first three flicks. all three turtles movies are referenced in this one.

I'm a turtles fan. I loved the first two movies, and i liked the third. i was excited when i heard that a fourth one was being made. if youre a turtles fan, and you plan on seeing this movie, my advice is keep your expectations low, unless youre six years old or younger. in that case you'll probably like it. this movie was made with only one thing in mind: selling toys to kids. It's a lame movie. the story is awful. really awful. full of cliches about ancient warriors, monsters comming out of different dimensions, and immortal curses. the movie is entirely digitally animated. things look kind of okay. some cool rain effects. the sets are cool. the character move (walk) a bit akwardly at times. the turtles hands and feet are abnormally large, but there are certain details like skin texture and veins and wrinkles which make them look alright. the human characters all look bad. my friend said he thinks splinter looks like chester cheetah. he's right. also, splinter sounds like a drunken pizza chef when he talks. oh, and there are not nearly enough pizza refferences in the movie. like, no pizza jokes. 06:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)~~george

That, and the part of the article where it says they have the canister of ooze, a time scepter, etc, would indicate that this film does include the previous films in its continuity. However the article says that it doesn't. Can we get solid evidence one way or the other? —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 22:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC).[reply

]

Except that the Scepter seen is clearly the one from the third movie and besides the Time Scepter was never theirs in the comics. User: Jay Verdi

There are a few problems with this film being part of the continuity of the first three films. 1.) Shredder's Helm. How could the the turtles have aquired it? Why is it not crushed? We can plainly see the helm get crushed at the end of the first film. 2.) from what I can tell by looking at pictures of the movie, splinter still has all of his right ear. If this was supposed to be in continuity his right ear would be missing because shredder cut it off in Japan. 3.) The turtles did not and could not return to the present time with any part of the samuri armor based on the rules of equal mass displacement outlined in the third film. Also at this point in the movie they've long abandoned their samuri armor. TimeCruiserMike 06:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's true that the Shredder's helmet was crushed, but if you remember the second movie. He reuses it and cuts it up with some steel saw or something making the helmet looking more jagged so maybe it's possible that the helmet didn't get damaged as bad as it appeared in the first movie especially if he would reuse it in such a short time after his fall from the building. I've heard that this movie had some tie ins to the previous movies, at least the first two and you can clearly see that the Shredder helmet looks to be the same as the first movie's appearance. But as to how the Turtles would have gotten it, or maybe that shouldn't be the right helmet if this new movie should really take place after the other ones and that it should look more like the second movies one with the jagged edges or that if it's the same helmet should it look more like the Super Shredder helmet since the helmet was changed due to the mutation? Maybe the creators of the new story didn't really take the time to look back in the past movies about exact character developments that occurred like Splinter's ear or the cloths that disappear in time travel and make the four movies follow better continually together.

It happens when movies are spaced too far apart. Continuity errors appear. However, it seems to me that TMNT is apart of the continuity, and we don't have any basis otherwise to suggest so. Disinclination 17:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GB2 IMDB. Wikipedia talk pages are NOT messageboards, post your movie reviews elsewhere kplzthxbai.

K00bine 06:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kurai, was not in the movies, the characters all had theyre visuals and personalaties of the then running 4lkids cartoon, so it would be logicle to believe its part of that series.

Over at Filmspot.com they say the movie is called "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Immortal". Any validity in this? JimmmyThePiep 18:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no, its been marketed as TMNT and nothing else, not even "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" its just TMNT. Sdphost 22:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Immortal" was a preliminary name for the movie at one point. The S 06:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article states this: "In a recent interview, director Kevin Munroe stated that he'd like to direct a possible sequel, possibly involving the return of the Shredder." I just saw the movie today, and towards the end, Karai subtlety hints at this. Oh course, then the turtles get the hint, and simultaneously shout out "The Shredder?!"The Great Morgil 01:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article states that this film takes place after TMNT 1,2 and 3. This is not exactly true. You see, there is no Karai in old TMNT movies, and April is a reporter there. This is because old movies were after old TMNT series, while new TMNT movie is after new TMNT 2003+ series. My best guess is that new TMNT movie takes place right before last Season 4 episode (ill-famous "The Ninja Tribunal"), and Karai actually hints the Turtles about upcoming True Shredder threat (as we know from Season 5, Karai knew about True Shredder from the very beginning and made some preparations). However it means that Episode 103 "Good Genes Part II" from Season 4 and "The Ninja Tribunal" are separated by...i don't know...a year? This may not be possible, because "The Ninja Tribunal" story arc begins in Episode 100 "A Tale of Master Yoshi" (first appearance of the Ninja Tribunal) and "Good Genes Part II" (elemental Heralds come into play). Anyways, they can't do a movie about Shredder's Return, because it is already done in Season 5. L.R.N 03:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, the film does not take place in the 2003 TV series continuity. oknazevad (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously think that this page should have a Cancelled Sequels section because there were lots of serious plans a decade ago for TMNT 2 and TMNT 3. According to animatedviews.com and other websites, the Director already had storylines for these two films. TMNT 2 would of featured Michelangelo feeling left out in his family and decides to join the Foot Clan, replacing his orange bandana with a black and while this is happening, the other three turtles travel to Japan where they cross paths with Karai and somewhere in there involves the return of the Shredder which was hinted in TMNT. TMNT 3 was to feature Technodrome's arrival from Dimension X along with the Triceratons. Mystic Moore 5:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

If you can find sources for that (and message boards are not reliable sources) I think it would. S a worthy addition. oknazevad (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there nothing on the horrible Rotten Tomatoe score this movie got? Right now the reception section is nothing but a gush piece picking out the few people who liked it while Rotten Tomatoes clearly shows that among critics it has a 32%. 128.227.48.253 03:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, certainly it should be added. One thing to note, however, is that critics and the "fans" often have different rating scores. It's one thing I've noted consistantly with RT. As with several horror movies, critics have often bashed many of them. However, the fans continually love the movies, despite their flaws (which they see quite clearly), and rate them high. So if you could post on here the link for the critic score and the "fan" score, it would be much appreciated and would be added to the article. :) Disinclination 17:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raphael being a night-only ,motorcycle-riding, using a chain as a weapon, anti-hero vigilante strikes you as Ghost Rider? I sure think it does. —The preceding

No, not really. Vigilantes usually work at night, and are often anti-heroes. That's like saying April's yellow jumpsuit is an homage to Kill Bill because they both fought ninjas.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.196.141 (talk • contribs)

I think it would be the other way around... April wore her yellow jumpsuit way before Kill Bill was released. Drewface (talk) 15:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portland local band Ever We Fall (of Hopeless Records) spent the weeks leading up to the film's release spreading word of their track "Youth Like Tigers" and its presence in the film. However, many fans were disappointed to learn that the scene featuring the track was roughly 15 seconds long ^{[citation needed]}; and the nature of that scene was not particularly significant. ^{[citation needed]} The use of music by Jet and P.O.D. received applause during the Portland press screening of the film. ^{[citation needed}

]

If someone can find appropriate citations for these (I couldn't), feel free to put it back. Disinclination 02:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know.. we're probably gunna get thwaped sooner or later for the length or the chaos of the summary. I'm trying to prune it up, but having more experienced people come in and change the wording would be helpful too. Disinclination 05:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its a complete mess right now. The events are all there but the order is completely off. I'm not too familiar with it right now but I may fix it later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.12.207 (talk) 23:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• All four films were released in March of their respective years.
• This film was released a week before the 17th anniversary of
  Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, 1 day after the 16th anniversary of The Secret of the Ooze, and 4 days after the 14th anniversary for Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III
  .

Include this in the article somewhere. Disinclination 23:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to put a little note in the trivia section until I noticed the message not to add anything more there. The artifacts on the lair's wall makes it clear viewers are supposed to see this movie as a sequel to the three previous films, but in the video game Shredder's design is based on the 2003 cartoon show. Even more telling are Mirage's comic book prequels and movie adaptation; triceratons are seen, utroms are mentioned, and the characters the Ancient One and the Ninja Tribunal make appearances. This all points to an interpretation that the movie can be viewed as extending from the 2003 show. —The preceding

Just because they use elements that are currently only found in the new cartoon does not meen the movie is conected to the show. And FYI Utroms and Triceratons are from the original comics. -Jay Verdi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.71.134 (talk • contribs)

I realize that the connected yet not-in-the-movie material could be non-canonical, but I believe it is worth mentioning in the wikipedia article so readers are aware and can come to their own conclusion. Also I am aware of the Utroms and Triceratons originating in the Mirage comics, but felt that Shredder's game design and the existence of the cartoon-only characters points to connections with the 2003 series.

Not to mention the inclusion of Karai, and the fact that the NT:TNM article contradict this idea. Otherwise Tatsu would have led the Foot clan in this movie, replacing Karai. Karai's presence is a clear indication that this movie is set in the 2003 series universe, and not the movie universe.

Ignoring the video game, the comic tie ins and looking at just the movie, this makes sense. And Karai's line implying the return of the Shredder (Utrom shredder, not Tengu Shredder) foreshadows the return of Shredder in Turtles Forever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.230.113.242 (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's set in the same universe as the previous films. Period. It ignores The Next Mutation, but whether that was actually set in the movie universe was unlikely in the first place. (After all, the Shredder was already dead.) As for the inclusion of Karai as the leader if the Foot, she's a character first created for the Mirage comics, not the 2003 series; her use neither proves or disproved anything. oknazevad (talk) 00:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YOur overlooking the point, the point isnt wether Karai si from the comics or not, it's the point that she's not in the films AT ALL, and is placed in this one as if she's been theyre all along, as well as April and KAcey being the 2003 cartoon versions and NOT The movie versions, not a reporter and training to be a ninja, definatly NOT the movie version of April. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.58.131 (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right, because people never change jobs or anything. And so what if Karai never appeared in a movie before? It's a debut if a character new to that continuity. You ignore the obvious, and rather intentional, continuity inclusions of the items from the first three films in the Turtles lair at the end of the film. Those were put there specifically to show that the film is in the same continuity as the live action films. oknazevad (talk) 19:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because they didnt treat it like a debut, they had her theyre, matter of factly like your supposed to know who she is and what she does which would mean it either follows the comics or the cartoon cause shes not in the movies.

The director had this to say.

"AV: How does your film fit into the Turtles universe? For instance, is it more of a continuation to the first three films or the latest TV series?

KM: You know, it’s funny. There’s so much you can do. There’s so much in the Turtles’ past, as far as adventures and stuff. So when we first started, we were trying to find what we were going to say – what was going to be lore and what wasn’t, for the movie. At the end of the day, we just realized, ‘Let’s just make the whole thing lore.’

Basically, they’ve lived all these adventures, and they’ve defeated all these villains. Now, they find themselves without direction, because they don’t have a common enemy to fight anymore. The movie became more about a rebirth of the heroes, instead of an origin story." http://animatedviews.com/2007/director-kevin-munroe-on-tmnt/

So basically it follows everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.161.103 (talk) 01:34, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reception piece in this article is an absolute joke. Specifically the box office section. It seems the excellent opening weekend is mentioned, but nothing of its dismal performance in later weeks is mentioned. —The preceding

Just giving a head's up to this article[1] where Munroe and Gray talk about how they had to tone down the fighting, most noticeably Mikey's nunchucks, which I thought were pretty much non-existent in the film. Might merit a mention in the article. - Annie D 07:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One bullet point in the trivia section consists of references to the previous films and to the comics. Perhaps this could be given its own section, if it's actually valuable information; otherwise it should probably just be removed. 63.163.61.3 15:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The trivia section contains many entries identical to those in the movie's IMDb trivia. Could someone with more time than me please do some copyediting ninjitsu to prevent copyvio? Rob T Firefly 00:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the trivia section, it says that all of the Generals' names are derived from Spanish and lists them, one of them being Mono for monkey. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I saw the movie yesterday and I don't recall seeing anyone by the name of Mono. There was a Colonel Santino, but I can't seem to figure out the meaning of his name, unless it comes from santo for saint, which doesn't seem right to me. I'm quite curious if anyone could shed some light on this matter. Czar Baldy Bald IV 14:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article currently says Santino (what's a santino? elephant?), but the toy of the character is definitely called Mono. However, i saw the movie yesterday and none of the generals other than Aquila (Eagle) were named in the movie. They barely spoke. The question is. what do the credits say? and speaking of Aquila, this article currently spells it Aguila, as Patrick Stewart's character said it was at the beginning, correcting April's pronunciation of 'akila', but later on Stewart pronounces it 'Akila' anyway, and since Aquila means eagle, that's probably his name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 20:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The credits say Santino but I still don't have any idea what that means. The TMNT video game names one of the bosses as a General Mono but he's not credited in the movie. As for Aguila, I believe that is truly his name as the Spanish for eagle is in fact "águila" rather than "aquila." Plus, I think that's how he's credited. Czar Baldy Bald IV 23:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Currently reads: "As of two weeks ago Imagi Entertainment (the TMNT movie animation studio) informed Mirage Studios that there was a 50-50 chance of a CGI film sequel. Last week they upped the odds to 70-30 in favor of a sequel, as talks between Imagi and their distribution partners Warner Brothers and the Weinstein Group seem to be heading in a positive direction."

I want information about a sequel but this is not sourced and undated. What was two weeks ago when this was written won't be two weeks ago when it's read...

I was just going to remove it but maybe someone else can fix it?

BTerran 16:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this tag on the top of the page:

This article or section contains a plot summary that is overly long or excessively detailed compared to the rest of the article.

I'll be the first to admit that I'm not the best guy for this job, but I would be willing to take on this task. All I ask is that when I'm done, someone else decide if I summarized it enough. I'll begin work right away. Larrythefunkyferret 04:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished. If anyone wiser than I am thinks that the issues in the tag have been addressed, would you please remove the tag? I don't feel right about doing it myself. Larrythefunkyferret 23:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's with all the links to articles like "legend", "horror (emotion)", etcetera in the plot section of the article? Doesn't seem very appropriate by wiki standards to have so many links to general articles like that.. Th 2005 (talk) 16:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on TMNT (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141126173925/http://www.tclchinesetheatres.com/year/2007/ to http://www.tclchinesetheatres.com/year/2007/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070503165300/http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=3219&page=1 to http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=3219&page=1
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/features/columns/e3i1e1961ef9c286a58c4bf6b958b5f3880
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.searchlightcomics.com/tmnt-sneak-peek-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the TMNT (film)#Voice cast section list them in this order? They're not alphabetical by the performers' names or the characters' names, and i doubt they're listed in order of who's most important to the plot or the order they first appear in the film. Is this the order the credits lists them? If they're in this order for a reason, the article should probably clarify that. Otherwise, we should rearrange the list in a more intuitive manner, most likely either starting with the Turtles (since the movie is named after them) or alphabetizing everyone by character name (based on the assumption that readers are more likely to wonder "Who voiced this character?" than "Which character did this person voice?")

Also,

--173.67.42.107 (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]