Talk:Talaash: The Answer Lies Within

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because... it contain the information about the next movie of aamir khan who is the king of hindi film industry --210.212.49.5 (talk) 01:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"King of Hindi film industry"... Seriously? That is your reason for NOT deleting this page. As I mentioned before, the article is nominated for speedy deletion because several different articles (3 to be exact) are created for the same film: Reema Kagti's Untitled Project. The film is still untitled according to the producers, yet people are still creating different articles for the same film without any reliable sources claiming this change. Until we have official confirmation that the film has a title, it would be best to leave it the way it is. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 14:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. -- Hadal (talk) 13:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Zakhmi (2012 film) → Reema Kagti's Untitled Project – According to recent reliable reports, as well as the official site of the production house (Excel Entertainment), the project is still untitled. I have explicitly stated that the project is still untitled and all these 'imaginary' titles are a figment imagination of the media. IMDb is a clearly unreliable source for this change. Lastly, by looking at the history of the page, you can notice that a previous move to the article (also "Zakhmi (2012)") resulted in that page being deleted. As I said before, until we have official confirmation that the film has a title, it would be best to leave it the way it is. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 01:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved and move protected so any more moves require a discussion here. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Act of MurderReema Kagti's Untitled Project – According to recent reliable reports, as well as the official site of the production house (Excel Entertainment), the project is still untitled. I have explicitly stated that the project is still untitled and all these 'imaginary' titles are a figment imagination of the media. User:Ajayakumaar had previously moved the page to "Zakhmi" saying that it was the original title and has done the same thing again without providing any reliable sources - this is seriously getting frustrating. As I said before, until we have official confirmation that the film has a title, it would be best to leave it the way it is. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 02:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support move per nomination. No sources are referring to this film as "The Act of Murder". BOVINEBOY2008 15:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Dhuaan

Dhuaan is the final and official name:

Should be moved now. Scieberking (talk) 21:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has been going on since the film entered principal photography. The media has been dilly-dallying with "The Act of Murder", "Dhuaan" and God knows what. Aamir Khan as well as the producers of the film still state that the project is still untitled. IMO, it would be best to leave it as it is until we get official confirmation. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 00:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Act Of Providence. I guess you're right. Scieberking (talk) 09:35, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to

Talaash (2012 film). Someone can create a dab page. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]



Reema Kagti's Untitled ProjectTalaash (film) – The film has finally been given a title. An Indian Express news article states that the movie will finally be called Talaash. I request to move the article to a new page with this title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catchuec2 (talkcontribs) 09:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support move per nomination. Several reliable sources such as this, this and this show that the film has finally been given a title. In addition to this, the film's producers: Ritesh Sidhwani and Aamir Khan have also confirmed the new title on their respective social-networking sites. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 16:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support. Aamir Khan himself has stated that the film title is Talaash. Though the most common internet name was Dhuaan. I suggest a quick move to the new page, or else a backlog and problems may appear later on. Besides, it's best to be speedy and updated. AnkitBhattTalk to me!!LifEnjoy 15:22, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per above comments. -
    talk) 16:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support per above. Scieberking (talk) 19:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Partial Support. Article should be moved to new title but not to
    Talaash (2012 film)
    as there are already two more movies with the same name. Talaash (1957 film), a Hindi film by Vishram Bedekar starring Bina Rai, Gajanan Jagirdar and Ashok Kumar along with Talash (1969 film) (one a less), a Hindi film by O.P. Ralhan starring Rajendra Kumar and Sharmila Tagore
Agree with this proposal. -
talk) 22:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edit request on 2 February 2012

Theatrical rights for the film sold for 90 crore (US$11 million). Here's a source from CNN-IBN and another from The Times of India. Thank you!

-- Karthik Nadar 11:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: This page is no longer protected. Subject to consensus, you should be able to edit it yourself. Anomie 20:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

I suggest a more descriptive account of the 'naming' of the film. There were some discussion on this talk page also, regarding the title of the film. So i think it is a significant information that needs to be added. |BINEET| 12:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bineetojha (talkcontribs)

Nature of Movie

In this article Talaash is described as psychological thriller but leading actor of the film, Aamir Khan rather prefers to call it suspense drama in his interview and further stretches point by saying there is great difference between suspense drama and thriller. Is there any difference? If yes, it should be changed.

talk) 17:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

There is no exact genre called suspense drama. Btw

Suspense
are the same. But it is psychological or not is questionable.
rahul (talk2me) 12:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Movie is somehow seems investigative,but no proper source is available. -25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 10:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The plot twist at the end is rather like a psychological thriller, but mystery film is more appropriate.----
07:59, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Provide more detail

The movie has been released on 30th November, 2012. Therefore, I request the creator of the article to find the detail of the plot. Lucifer171999 (talk) 09:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone can be a creator here, just as everyone can read. Please do help! Look up published reviews and write a few sentences (with proper
citation) here on this talk-page that you think should be added based on what you can find. DMacks (talk) 11:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

First day collections

First day collection is 14.5 crore inr and not 12.5 crore inr as mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adityavr1 (talkcontribs) 1 December 2012

Not done: please provide
reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Edit request on 9 December 2012

There's a blooper in the movie. In the scene where the Girls are escorted out by Shashi, Rosie's reflection is caught in the Mirror despite being attributed a Ghost! This should be added in the Blooper Section of the Article. Agentemm (talk) 03:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide
reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

hey uyou use boxofficeindia for providing domestic collections but they say first week net collection is 63 crore so correct that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.200.167 (talk) 10:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

-> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsayi (talkcontribs) 19:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 10 December 2012

Change the earning of the movie. It has grossed Rs.75 crore on the end of day 10.The same can be verified from www.boxofficeindia.com FaiqMahmoodKhanKashmiri (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ----
18:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

This user is removing the notable positive and mixed reviews and replacing them with unnotable ones like Open Magazine which is not even an overseas magazine and based in New Delhi. --139.190.171.30 (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS. --139.190.171.30 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
Nope.----
18:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

How can we say it is not:

--139.190.171.30 (talk) 08:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 26 December 2012

this is test 115.252.82.170 (talk) 09:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note:Was just for testing edit requests without any harm. Thanks you.
Talk」 17:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]