Talk:Tek Jansen

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Comics: United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by United States comics work group. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Is this a quote or what? He's seen smiling on two of the covers of the comics. 66.28.71.162 (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got that from No Fact Zone's interview with Scott Chantler, linked in the footnote. One of the first pieces of advice Stephen gave him was that Tek doesn't smile, because even though he might be funny to us, he has no sense of humour about himself. I know there's an early piece of artwork that shows Tek smiling, but that was turned down by Colbert's people because it was too light-hearted and cartoony and they were interested in a more serious, dramatic style. Shoemoney2night (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He also laughs in the second episode. I included the reference. 24.202.251.225 (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From what I just learned from reading the discussion section to the wiki entry on William Shatner there is an ongoing lawsuit between Shatner and Colbert over the use of the word "tek". If anyone has any info on this scandel it would be helpful, otherwise I might footnote the Shatner discussion entry as a credible source for this article. Teetotaler 24 July, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.22.207 (talk) 04:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find the discussion in question, but for a source to be considered credible it generally has to have been published by an external body. I did a a quick search on Google News and found no results linking TekWars/Shatner and Tek Jansen/Colbert. I can't imagine there's any truth in it, but in any case it shouldn't be included in the article until somebody can find a solid external news source to back it up. -Shoemoney2night (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agent Michael Scarn would kick Tek Jansen's ass in a heartbeat. Just sayin' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.203.130.138 (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tek Jansen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071224185811/http://www.animationinsider.net/article.php?articleID=1506 to http://www.animationinsider.net/article.php?articleID=1506
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061129193732/http://www.onipress.com/buzz/?p=96%2F to http://www.onipress.com/buzz/?p=96%2F
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071004223305/http://www.onipress.com/display.php?type=bk&id=301 to http://www.onipress.com/display.php?type=bk&id=301

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]