Talk:The Dearborn Independent

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Detroit task force. Journalism Low‑importance Religion: Interfaith Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive. Jewish history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative Views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

--71.103.233.23 01:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the inside title page of the book as inappropriate--we have it already at the WP article on the book.

I'm in the process of having the image of the May 22, 1920 issue converted to JPEG from WORD for uploading.

Ludvikus 12:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This stub is a very incomplete history of the newspaper, which actually continued circulation for many years after stated in here. I have gone through old issues from 1938-1953 and beyond. It did follow H. Ford's opinions, but for most of its history it was indistinguishable from any other general city paper - T. Talbot

There is absolutely no source to claim the Dearborn Independent is a sensationalist newspaper. Its articles include topics from 'Abraham Lincoln as a poet' to the economic state of the country. Unless a reliable citation is provided, this phrase should be omitted from the article. Thodef (talk) 15:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here you can consult a specimen of the Dearborn Independent, vol. 27/4. There's nothing sensationalist about topics such as Their days in the Yellow leaf or The American Merchant Marine -- Must Be Built by Business Enterprise and Not by Government Subsidy. Thodef (talk) 15:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The newspaper published The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which was discredited by The Times of London as a forgery during the Independent's publishing run."

There is no citation given. The protocols are a work of literature not a forgery. The protocols are a propaganda tool which purport to show various ways in which Jewish people co-operate at a cost to societies in which they reside and end up dominating those societies. The protocols have great predictive power if we see them this way. Jewish capitalist Jacob Schiff in the US gave $20 million to Jewish Bolsheviks. This is an example of the "nation within and across nations" which was suggested by the Protocols. This video shows how accurately the protocols predicted events up to the present http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-xjLa9xrOo - of course the author is attacked in every media in which Jewish people have an influence.

I suggest that firstly a citation if found for the above line in the article and secondly the line be rewritten to be more accurate. Was the Times owned by Jewish people at the time this article was written, was the author of the article Jewish? It is important to know if this article (if it exists) is independent.

As a side note, it is a problem that so many "official" sources of news are owned or controlled by Jewish people. Their gate keepers prevent information which is is critical of their actions getting out, and offers the opportunity for them to promote their issues, products and people. If something problematic for them gets out the only have to give it less attention than it deserves for it to go "down the memory hole." — Preceding unsigned comment added by TedGolden (talk • contribs) 07:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is omitted that Ford apologised in the wake of litigation that did not fall in his favour; this should be amended. 86.154.34.159 (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can we call everything as anti-Semitic and garner sympathies. We are only 10 million Jews and how can we dictate 7 billion other people? Do you realise you are yourself classifying every article which disagrees with you as anti-Semitic, which even help other to search them and use that against us? The hatred we get in middle East will take over the entire world if try to keep on putting lables on everything. Muslims never call anyone Anti-Muslim if some one speak against them. Christians never call anyone anti-christian. You are yourself antagonizing people against you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:2514:898C:0:0:B52:D8B1 (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Azure94:. In this edit, you add a section sourced to Pool and Pool, 1978. However, that is not referenced fully in this article. Are you able to recall what you were referencing so we can add that? Thank you. Freelance-frank (talk) 22:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Who Financed Hitler: The Secret Funding of Hitler's Rise to Power, 1919-1933? Freelance-frank (talk) 22:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]