Talk:The Happy Land

The Happy Land received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

A fact from The Happy Land appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Gladstone (newspaper illustration pictured)? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/June.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gilbert and Sullivan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gilbert and Sullivan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gilbert and SullivanWikipedia:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanTemplate:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanGilbert and Sullivan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Theatre Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance is arguable, as is class - this is either a relatively important low, or a relatively unimportant medium, and, likewise, a relatively good, referenced Start, or a fairly awful B. Adam Cuerden ^talk 21:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely a "start" - It has no plot summary, cast list, textual analysis.... As to importance, only the G&Ss, Cox and Box and maybe Engaged really get up above low. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 21:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, though I've seen a few guideline pages disparaging the necessity of plot summaries. In any case, not bad for a few hours' work, eh? Adam Cuerden ^talk 21:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Archive has a brief synopsis that you could refer to, and the libretto is on the archive. There may be other online sources as well, and there are the articles noted under "Further Reading." A good start, though! -- Ssilvers 22:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll continue in the morning. It's late and I need to rest. Adam Cuerden ^talk 22:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Take a look at this: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view.php?pid=UQ:11082. Have a good night. -- Ssilvers 22:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I think if you added a good synopsis this would be a B-class article. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 00:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I waited long enough, so I've gone and done it meself.... -- Ssilvers 18:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the by, the image from this article is up for Featured Picture. here. Not sure if it'll get promoted - it's a vote short at the moment. But we shall see! Adam Cuerden ^talk 00:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]