Talk:The John Larroquette Show

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 16:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I think it is probably valid to discuss the show's perceived downturn falling the reduction in "dark humor," there are two problems with how it is phrased: a) the show last about three seasons after this change, so it wasnt the worst thing that could have happened, Im sure you could make a case the show would have been cancelled sooner without these changes and b) saying that the changes led to it "ultimately being cancelled" is odd. It lasted for 50 more episodes after the change and like I said, the change may have kept it on longer. They might have changed the vibe of the show to one you didnt like, but leading to its cancellation seems to be too much to say —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.230.158.167 (talk) 07:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this is unsubstantiated POV. --71.126.49.68 (talk) 03:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Home Viewing section is undocumented and includes speculation. OldExpat (talk) 03:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]