Talk:The Lovers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

I removed the "Examples" section since it was entirely

Original Research which Wikipedia does not allow. I left the "mythopoeteic interpretation" section because that may have come from a reputable source but it seems to be something based on personal interpretation like the "Examples" section. - DNewhall

Unverifiable and unbalanced content

The article is just personal opinions from an occult enthusiast about the nature and meaning of a particular tarot card. No peer reviewed books or journal articles are cited. No references or footnotes are given. When a new statement is added, the source needs to be

reliable
. Waite is not an unbiased, factual source on the history or evolution of tarot cards. The work can be cited properly, however: "Waite's opinion in his book The Pictorial Key to the Tarot ... etc" The other sources are completely suspect as to their academic nature.

The card in question has a history of over 500 years in European card games in which it is used as trump card (see

NPOV issues. There are academic sources and sources from international organizations discussing the history and evolution of the Lovers card (know original as the Love card) as well as its use in games. These need to be utilized. - Parsa 06:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]