Talk:The Maritime Experiential Museum

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Singapore Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This material seems to have been confused onto the Chinese museum Maritime Silk Route Museum in Guangdong

Hence I have moved it here. Chaosdruid (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was an amazingly large amount of detail which was a copyvio from the www.asia.si.edu site which states "All presented material is copyright © Smithsonian Institution,"

Particularly [1] and [2]

The page now needs some more info adding, which is not a

Chaosdruid (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

@ IP who last edited: I have undone your edits - Not all the edits were bad ones, but as they were done in one big edit I could not separate the good from the bad. You introduced some interesting innacuracies - the items were not recovered from the Jewel of Muscat, for example, as the Jewel never sank? SOme of the text is not really relevant to the Museum and none of them were cited with refs. I have to go out for a while but will look over and try and pick out some of the salient correct points for re-insertion in a while Chaosdruid (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted to a pre-copyvio version.

I did not welcome the comments on my talk page suggesting I had performed copyvios. The editor should have read this talk page and the article history and they should have reverted it themselves; instead of casting aspersions on other editors. Chaosdruid (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The editor placing the tag did not research the article history. If they had done so they would have seen that the page was entirely replaced with copyvio text today. I have reverted to the pre-copyvio version which is really what the drive-by-taggin editor should have done. --Chaosdruid (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the tag, I am terribly sorry about this confusion. There were two articles with exactly the same content, just the titles spelled a little different, I confess I only looked at the history of the other. The Last Angry Man (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Maritime Experiential Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317120431/http://www.jewelofmuscat.tv/en/node/418 to http://www.jewelofmuscat.tv/en/node/418

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]