Talk:The New York Times anonymous publications

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Journalism Low‑importance New York (state) Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/anonymous-op-ed-new-york-times-history-donald-trump-719929/

Something like "The New York Times anonymous op-ed publications" ? Yug (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That would be better, yes. I think ideally we'd want a broader article on The New York Times Op-Ed with a list of columnists currently and over the years, etc.--Pharos (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pharos, I crossed some general materials and general op-ed definition on the The New York Times Op-Ed, but I leave this stone for another. Converting this article into a section of a (The) New York Times op-ed would be quite easy I think.

Are you an English native ? I wonder if The New York Times anonymous op-ed publications or (The) New York Times anonymous op-ed publications. Yug (talk) 15:40, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am a native speaker. We should include the "The", just because it is English Wikipedia convention to include the full title of a newspaper. The most natural name in English would be The New York Times anonymous op-ed pieces, but "pieces" sounds a bit informal. Maybe Anonymous op-eds in The New York Times would be best.--Pharos (talk) 16:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added an article from 1972 which is not an op-ed (though it is similar to one), if we decide to keep it I guess that would affect the name.--Pharos (talk) 17:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It should probably be called "List of...", (or deleted altogether as the product of pure trivia/bored Wikipedians inspired by a single current event) because while isolated incidents get passing notice, the subject itself does not appear to be a discrete topic significantly covered by reliable sources.

WP:LISTCRITERIA offer more info. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Wondering too but I think it's ok. It may evolve in a more general NYT op-ed article. Yug (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To me, this article reads like a "

BarbadosKen (talk) 01:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

See https://www.google.com/search?q=anonymous+NYT+op-ed&tbm=nws Yug (talk) 14:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]